Life 3 - The Road from Rio
- Description
- Reviews
- Citation
- Cataloging
- Transcript
If you are not affiliated with a college or university, and are interested in watching this film, please register as an individual and login to rent this film. Already registered? Login to rent this film.
Alexandra is a poor suburb of Johannesburg, but it's within sight of the prestigious Sandton Convention Centre. The venue was the home for what was billed as the most important international conference of this century: the World Summit on Sustainable Development, which opened on 26 August 2002.
In THE ROAD FROM RIO, life in Johannesburg is seen through the eyes of Nankie, a DJ on the community radio station Alex FM. She's excited by the prospect of delegations from around the world flying in to her hometown to debate the world's environmental problems and new ways to create a global society without the class divisions that have continued to widen, leaving the power and wealth in the hands of a covetous few.
The 'Jo'burg Summit' took place 10 years after the Rio Earth Summit, and a full 30 years after the first international conference on the human environment, which convened in Stockholm in 1972. But as world leaders prepared for the meeting, hard questions were being raised. What could the conference really hope to achieve? And why - when governments have failed to deliver on so many of the promises they made at Rio - should the world believe they'd be any more sincere this time around?
With the support of the European Commission Directorate General for Development to promote better understanding of development issues; the Directorate General for the Environment; and the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Citation
Main credits
Bradshaw, Steve (film director)
Bradshaw, Steve (screenwriter)
Matabane, Khalo (film director)
Richards, Jenny (editor of moving image work)
Collonge, Cécile (editor of moving image work)
Other credits
Series editor, Jenny Richards; editor, Cécile Collonge.
Distributor subjects
African Studies; Anthropology; Developing World; Economics; Environment; Geography; Globalization; Humanities; International Studies; Law; Poverty; Sociology; Sustainable Development; Sustainable Development; United NationsKeywords
WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.000
[music]
00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:34.999
And this is eighty-nine, I\'m Miss Nankie.
00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:39.999
My name is Miss Nankie Xhole. (inaudible)
00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:44.999
and I love you. Welcome to Alex FM.
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:50.000
I\'m the town that DJ Nankie loves, Alexandra,
the suburb of Johannesburg in South Africa.
00:00:55.000 --> 00:00:59.999
You\'re enjoying yourself, of course.
So just stay tuned.
00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:04.999
This month Nankie\'s listeners will be playing host to what\'s
billed as the biggest international conference this century,
00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:09.999
the World Summit on
Sustainable Development,
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:14.999
South Africa welcoming over 60,000 people to
debate nothing less than the future of the planet.
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:19.999
We want to host the summit because we went to work
towards their education of poverty in the world.
00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:24.999
We went to make sure
that our common destiny
00:01:25.000 --> 00:01:29.999
takes into account, the wellbeing
of everyone of the whole humanity.
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:34.999
And that\'s what is important for
all of us, and for South Africa.
00:01:35.000 --> 00:01:39.999
South Africa\'s guests won\'t have to look far for the
kind of poverty the summits meant to eradicate.
00:01:40.000 --> 00:01:44.999
Just take a tour around the streets of Alex
and talk to the people who live there.
00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:49.999
We\'re living in a… in a bad situation, environment
itself is bad. 50 people living in one yard.
00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:54.999
It\'s not a bad experience at all.
And sharing the toilet
00:01:55.000 --> 00:01:59.999
then using the same drain whatever doing, washing dishes
and all things. It\'s a bad experience for everybody like
00:02:00.000 --> 00:02:04.999
health wise and all those things.
00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:09.999
We don\'t have even a tree for shade. We don\'t have
a current (inaudible) environment in Alexandra,
00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:14.999
this all stuff. Even a (inaudible)
is a privilege to live in a house
00:02:15.000 --> 00:02:19.999
that is a (inaudible). It was since I was
born, I never had a (inaudible) in my hut.
00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:24.999
Growing up in Alex\'s a bad environment
with the danger of social breakdown.
00:02:25.000 --> 00:02:29.999
Definitely growing up in
Johannesburg is not an easy thing.
00:02:30.000 --> 00:02:34.999
First of all, you know, you… you need a family
and a community support not to get drawn into,
00:02:35.000 --> 00:02:39.999
for example, anti-social behavior. So you find
that the current rate, for example, Johannesburg,
00:02:40.000 --> 00:02:44.999
is… is very high, not to be positive because of
Johannesburg or the use of Johannesburg by the bad people,
00:02:45.000 --> 00:02:49.999
but because of this environment
into their growing up,
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:54.999
it has taken education. Many people advocate education, but
they forget that shelter is a business for good education.
00:02:55.000 --> 00:02:59.999
If (inaudible) has been sleeping
in a room with eight other people,
00:03:00.000 --> 00:03:04.999
so you\'ve been there night was uncomfortable.
How do you expect a child to pay
00:03:05.000 --> 00:03:09.999
attention in school? Because of health depends
on where you live. You know, so for example,
00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:14.999
there\'s no question of slum life. Therefore,
it becomes almost every (inaudible).
00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:19.999
What could the Summit do for people like you see
in Alexandra? You know, I think this summit
00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:24.999
uh… is really going to boost a lot of…
00:03:25.000 --> 00:03:29.999
and unleash a lot of energies for those
people who are already looking at
00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:34.999
what they can do to really take
development into their heads.
00:03:35.000 --> 00:03:39.999
And I think that\'s for me
is a very positive thing
00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:44.999
because there\'s a lot of energy in the world
to do something about poverty eradication.
00:03:45.000 --> 00:03:49.999
And if our leader, political leadership
can give a very clear direction,
00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:54.999
and very clear guide. The whole
world will embrace that program.
00:03:55.000 --> 00:03:59.999
While the summits being hosted by the
South Africans, its political program
00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:04.999
has been drawn up by the United Nations who
dubbed it the Sustainable Development Summit.
00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:09.999
But just what is sustainable development?
00:04:10.000 --> 00:04:14.999
Sustainable development is integrated development. It is
where you build a societal approach which is owned locally
00:04:15.000 --> 00:04:19.999
where there is a reason for it to happen,
00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:24.999
where trees are perceived as
being a value to the community,
00:04:25.000 --> 00:04:29.999
uh… not something that you cut
down uh… just to get wood
00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:34.999
where cleanliness, where uh…
dealing with degradation
00:04:35.000 --> 00:04:39.999
of an environment is seen by the people as affecting
their health, as affecting their possibilities.
00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:44.999
I believe sustainable development means
00:04:45.000 --> 00:04:49.999
uh… a development in which uh… there is much greater
equity than there is in today\'s for more development,
00:04:50.000 --> 00:04:54.999
much greater uh… emphasis on maintaining
the environment, and the resource base,
00:04:55.000 --> 00:04:59.999
and much greater emphasis on an economic development
that basically meets the needs of the poorest.
00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:04.999
Simply, if you want to look
at it in business terms,
00:05:05.000 --> 00:05:09.999
it\'s like running the earth as earth
incorporated with the depreciation,
00:05:10.000 --> 00:05:14.999
amortization and maintenance account
which simply means ensuring
00:05:15.000 --> 00:05:19.999
that you… you the… through
the production process,
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:24.999
we do not destroy the underlying
assets which continued
00:05:25.000 --> 00:05:29.999
uh… development depends on. Sustainable development was
meant to have been the outcome of the Earth Summit
00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:34.999
in Rio de Janeiro, 10 years ago, held
at the climax of international concern
00:05:35.000 --> 00:05:39.999
about the global environment. Leaders around
the world signed up to a series of agreements
00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:44.999
to put the global economy on
a more sustainable footing.
00:05:45.000 --> 00:05:49.999
But those who are involved now have mixed feelings
about whether those promises were delivered.
00:05:50.000 --> 00:05:54.999
The disappointments, of course, unluckily
00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:59.999
more than positive signals.
They have one side, of course,
00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:04.999
is the huge increase in the
gap between rich and poor,
00:06:05.000 --> 00:06:09.999
it\'s a social component.
We have not decreased
00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:14.999
the problems of water,
we have not decreased
00:06:15.000 --> 00:06:19.999
the extension weight of biodiversity,
we have little decrease of course,
00:06:20.000 --> 00:06:24.999
(inaudible) into wood. And
especially, they even couldn\'t go
00:06:25.000 --> 00:06:29.999
in the positive direction concerning,
it\'s an economical population.
00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:34.999
You know, we didn\'t do it all.
We didn\'t save the world real.
00:06:35.000 --> 00:06:39.999
But we did provide the basis
on which if governments
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:44.999
and others live up to what they agreed
to do in Rio, we will be on a pathway
00:06:45.000 --> 00:06:49.999
to a more sustainable future. The
achievements were very clearly
00:06:50.000 --> 00:06:54.999
that more than ever
before the world leaders,
00:06:55.000 --> 00:06:59.999
more ever, in fact, more world leaders than up to that
point has ever assembled around any particular issue,
00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:04.999
focused on the longer term
future of life on our planet.
00:07:05.000 --> 00:07:09.999
Well, uh… I must admit
00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:14.999
that either I was fooled or… or it was
uh… really coming from the heart,
00:07:15.000 --> 00:07:19.999
the statements of a large
number of the heads of state
00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:24.999
in the last couple of
days were very impressive
00:07:25.000 --> 00:07:29.999
indicating that we are on the verge of a different
type of word that there will be cooperation,
00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:34.999
there would be support, there would be
understanding, better understanding.
00:07:35.000 --> 00:07:39.999
And I were so thrilled with the fact
that what is stronger managed to get
00:07:40.000 --> 00:07:44.999
all these people uh… together. And they were
committing themselves as openly in this
00:07:45.000 --> 00:07:49.999
uh… direction, and I… it
never crossed my mind
00:07:50.000 --> 00:07:54.999
that this is a… a show that
we are… we are on Broadway.
00:07:55.000 --> 00:07:59.999
The promises of politicians to kids
like those in Alex just show biz.
00:08:00.000 --> 00:08:04.999
Maybe, it doesn\'t matter, most people in the
world are better off than 10 years ago.
00:08:05.000 --> 00:08:09.999
But old problems haven\'t gone away, and disturbing
new trends have emerged for a new century.
00:08:10.000 --> 00:08:14.999
Poverty continues to be to exist
00:08:15.000 --> 00:08:19.999
in tremendous ways. Globalization has taken
place. And it\'s good, there\'s economic
00:08:20.000 --> 00:08:24.999
uh… improvements in some parts of the
world. But it is created greater disparity
00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:29.999
in some parts of the world. The pandemic of
HIV AIDS has really torn apart some societies
00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:34.999
and made it more difficult
for things to get done.
00:08:35.000 --> 00:08:39.999
Wars are on the increase in terms of the impact inside
society. The victims today are largely civilian,
00:08:40.000 --> 00:08:44.999
not military any more. So if you
combine poverty, more HIV AIDS,
00:08:45.000 --> 00:08:49.999
and a lack of government, and private
sector leadership, it comes together to say
00:08:50.000 --> 00:08:54.999
too little has been accomplished.
00:08:55.000 --> 00:09:03.000
[music]
00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:24.999
One reason to (inaudible) has been delivered is that
foreign aid from the rich countries to the poor
00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:29.999
has actually declined since Rio. Some say,
it\'s because with the end of the Cold War,
00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:34.999
the rich don\'t need to bribe the poor not
to get communist anymore. Others say,
00:09:35.000 --> 00:09:39.999
it\'s really a lot simpler than that.
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:44.999
Well, no one\'s doubt is very disappointing,
00:09:45.000 --> 00:09:49.999
and no one should look for a deep
complex, sophisticated reason.
00:09:50.000 --> 00:09:54.999
There is a strong tendency in both private
00:09:55.000 --> 00:09:59.999
and public affairs for
people who haven\'t come
00:10:00.000 --> 00:10:04.999
and have wealth to want more,
00:10:05.000 --> 00:10:09.999
and to be negligent as far
as the people who have less.
00:10:10.000 --> 00:10:14.999
As I say that works as between individuals
00:10:15.000 --> 00:10:19.999
and unfortunate works in
between nation states.
00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:24.999
Meantime, the people with wealth have been getting rich
up much faster than the poor have been escaping poverty,
00:10:25.000 --> 00:10:29.999
and equality on the increase both
between, and within nations.
00:10:30.000 --> 00:10:34.999
It\'s happening in (inaudible) poor
Alex losing out to rich Sandton,
00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:39.999
where this year\'s Summit will be
held close to D.J. Nankie station.
00:10:40.000 --> 00:10:44.999
The World Summit wished of all, it\'s going
to be held at Sandton Convention Centre,
00:10:45.000 --> 00:10:49.999
and from here in Alex to go to
Sandton uh… it\'s 15 minutes drive,
00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:54.999
you know. It\'s not far from here.
00:10:55.000 --> 00:10:59.999
[music]
00:11:00.000 --> 00:11:04.999
Sandton is a shopping centre. It\'s… it\'s a
Mall whereby, you know, people from Alex
00:11:05.000 --> 00:11:09.999
usually go to Sandton to… to have a
good time there. We buy at Sandton.
00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:14.999
Everything Sandton. Sandton
is a very nice place.
00:11:15.000 --> 00:11:19.999
[music]
00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:24.999
Alex and Sandton, they\'re two
different worlds. It\'s like there
00:11:25.000 --> 00:11:29.999
you like you\'re a queen. When you\'re
there, you\'re wearing nice clothes.
00:11:30.000 --> 00:11:34.999
And everything, you\'re a Queen, you\'re
walking on nice grounds, you know?
00:11:35.000 --> 00:11:39.999
And you\'re respected, regardless of
whether you come in a shed place.
00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:44.999
Nobody knows you come from Alex, you know, you\'re respected.
But the minute somebody knows you come from Alex,
00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:49.999
you… you get judged. Ten minutes you\'re in
Sandton, five minutes you\'re in Alexandra.
00:11:50.000 --> 00:11:54.999
So even the materials, the space
of the houses, the streets,
00:11:55.000 --> 00:11:59.999
the cars… So it\'s a desire for
everybody to live in Sandton.
00:12:00.000 --> 00:12:04.999
[music]
00:12:05.000 --> 00:12:09.999
Everybody, when you wake up,
you want to live in Sandton.
00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:14.999
It\'s two worlds,
00:12:15.000 --> 00:12:19.999
though sometimes people do have their
doubts which they\'d really rather live in.
00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:24.999
I would live there, but most of the time I\'d be
here. Because here I… we know each other here,
00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:29.999
you know? There\'s like that thing of knowing each other, and
you feel at home when you\'re here even though it\'s dangerous
00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:34.999
but it\'s… it\'s an environment that you\'re
used to, you\'re used to coming here at home
00:12:35.000 --> 00:12:39.999
and stuff like that, you know? So, there you don\'t know a lot of
people. People are just closed up in their houses and everything.
00:12:40.000 --> 00:12:44.999
[sil.]
00:12:45.000 --> 00:12:49.999
Extremes of wealth and poverty,
00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:54.999
the argument goes, lead not
just to a fragmented society,
00:12:55.000 --> 00:12:59.999
but to huge pressures on the world\'s
resources. And societies that are so unequal
00:13:00.000 --> 00:13:04.999
may prove unsustainable politically too.
In the long run uh… today,
00:13:05.000 --> 00:13:09.999
it\'s obvious that the basic
life support systems, uh…
00:13:10.000 --> 00:13:14.999
that uh… everyone depends on the rich
and the poor are under great threat.
00:13:15.000 --> 00:13:19.999
And a large part of that threat is from
affluence, from large-scale use for
00:13:20.000 --> 00:13:24.999
uh… of these resources by the rich but
also in part from the damages done by…
00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:29.999
by poor people. A way
of life on this planet
00:13:30.000 --> 00:13:34.999
in which there are a few rich people and a large
number of poor people is not sustainable,
00:13:35.000 --> 00:13:39.999
I believe from an ecological point of view and
certainly not from a political point of view.
00:13:40.000 --> 00:13:44.999
I think it\'s a misuse of
the term \"sustainable\"
00:13:45.000 --> 00:13:49.999
to talk about that. We\'d like to think that
inequality and injustice are \"unsustainable\".
00:13:50.000 --> 00:13:54.999
Uh… unfortunately, you know, history says that\'s not
true. Umm… it may be a bad thing, but it\'s not,
00:13:55.000 --> 00:13:59.999
it\'s not something that you should confuse. It… it, you
know, inequality in the world is not unsustainable
00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:04.999
the way that… that fishing out the entire
world\'s stock of fish is unsustainable.
00:14:05.000 --> 00:14:09.999
Does it matter if we\'re more
unequal if we\'re also richer?
00:14:10.000 --> 00:14:14.999
Oh, I would always come
out for other pressure,
00:14:15.000 --> 00:14:19.999
for a more equal national
00:14:20.000 --> 00:14:24.999
and international society
00:14:25.000 --> 00:14:29.999
partly for umm… reasons that have
very little to do with economics.
00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:34.999
I think every civilised country
should have a few screams
00:14:35.000 --> 00:14:39.999
of anguish from the very rich.
00:14:40.000 --> 00:14:44.999
And that\'s just what many in the rich world fear the
Johannesburg Summit will be, an attempt to make
00:14:45.000 --> 00:14:49.999
the rich scream with anguish. If sustainable development
does means redistributing wealth and regulating business,
00:14:50.000 --> 00:14:54.999
it\'s not surprising that some particularly in
North America view the environmental movement
00:14:55.000 --> 00:14:59.999
that preaches sustainable
development as a threat.
00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:04.999
And this ideological tussle is
getting increasingly acrimonious.
00:15:05.000 --> 00:15:09.999
It\'s one of the things that really depresses me about the past decade
as we\'ve seen the rise of a… actually anti-environmental movement.
00:15:10.000 --> 00:15:14.999
I mean there are people, I think people who have, who have the
ear of the White House, who actually take some positive pleasure
00:15:15.000 --> 00:15:19.999
in disporting some environmental areas.
Why would they do that?
00:15:20.000 --> 00:15:24.999
Umm… because the environmental movement came to be a
symbol of people pestering them about their business.
00:15:25.000 --> 00:15:29.999
I think it\'s… it\'s really, you know, it\'s
not all about economic self-interest.
00:15:30.000 --> 00:15:34.999
Unfortunately, there are symbols on both sides. So
is that going to hinder progress at Johannesburg?
00:15:35.000 --> 00:15:39.999
Oh, enormously. The United States is… you know,
you can\'t do much without the U.S ultimately,
00:15:40.000 --> 00:15:44.999
and the United States is not really interested in this
game. It\'s not just that the U.S can seem disinterested.
00:15:45.000 --> 00:15:49.999
Some Washington lobbyists would actually
like to see the Jo\'burg Summit fail,
00:15:50.000 --> 00:15:54.999
especially, if Rio was a precedent.
00:15:55.000 --> 00:15:59.999
I was at the Rio Conference in I992. It was a circus.
Everyone was running around, caring about the environment,
00:16:00.000 --> 00:16:04.999
and saying how we had to be concerned about
Planet Earth, but with not the slightest idea
00:16:05.000 --> 00:16:09.999
of what policies actually would allow
Planet Earth to actually be saved.
00:16:10.000 --> 00:16:14.999
But these lobbyists from the American
Right aren\'t just green bashers.
00:16:15.000 --> 00:16:19.999
They have arguments which support as of
the Jo\'burg Summit will have to answer.
00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:24.999
They say that all we really need to guarantee
sustainable development is human ingenuity.
00:16:25.000 --> 00:16:29.999
If you look at any resource that has
been integrated into the system
00:16:30.000 --> 00:16:34.999
of human relevant institutions
uh… food, metals, energy,
00:16:35.000 --> 00:16:39.999
uh… forestry and so forth. One finds
that as man\'s demands increase,
00:16:40.000 --> 00:16:44.999
one, and… and those demands
sometimes trigger short-term supply
00:16:45.000 --> 00:16:49.999
imbalances then we find prices go
up, and we do one of three things:
00:16:50.000 --> 00:16:54.999
we find more of that supply somewhere in the
world, we find ways of using the existing
00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:59.999
supply more efficiently, we find ways of
economising on that now scarce resource,
00:17:00.000 --> 00:17:04.999
or we find technological substitutes.
And that process repeated over
00:17:05.000 --> 00:17:09.999
and over again in field after field is what\'s made it
possible for western civilisation to be sustainable.
00:17:10.000 --> 00:17:14.999
Yes, but uh… new technologies
have come along.
00:17:15.000 --> 00:17:19.999
Uh… and they do help the environment.
But by the same token,
00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:24.999
we… that\'s what we\'ve been doing, we\'ve been letting things
go. And… and overall although there\'s been progress,
00:17:25.000 --> 00:17:29.999
overall the environmental condition
of the world, and therefore,
00:17:30.000 --> 00:17:34.999
the prospects for our future have
deteriorated. That\'s what\'s happened.
00:17:35.000 --> 00:17:39.999
In Alex, houseproud DJ Nankie dusts
urban grime from the family home.
00:17:40.000 --> 00:17:44.999
According to the American Right,
if you own it, you look after it.
00:17:45.000 --> 00:17:49.999
That\'s why they say the best route to
sustainability is private ownership.
00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:54.999
One of the hopes one could see, if one
really wishes a sustainable earth,
00:17:55.000 --> 00:17:59.999
would be to have a creative
programme of privatisation
00:18:00.000 --> 00:18:04.999
to extend the concepts of ownership to those
resources that have been left out in the cold.
00:18:05.000 --> 00:18:09.999
We see no depletion in areas that are owned
00:18:10.000 --> 00:18:14.999
because by ownership rights encourage you not only
to use wisely today, but to ensure the value of
00:18:15.000 --> 00:18:19.999
that so you can sell it, and utilise that value for the future.
So you think more privatisation, more private ownership?
00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:24.999
Ecological privatisation is the critical
answer to addressing environmental problems.
00:18:25.000 --> 00:18:29.999
Uh… and, well, you look about us. Uh…
there\'s no endangered Persian cat problem.
00:18:30.000 --> 00:18:34.999
There\'s an endangered tiger problem.
What do you make of this argument
00:18:35.000 --> 00:18:39.999
that umm… property rights are the
answer to the sustainable development?
00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:44.999
Property rights are important in making
it possible for the banking system
00:18:45.000 --> 00:18:49.999
and for the investments that are
needed uh… to be protected.
00:18:50.000 --> 00:18:54.999
But I certainly don\'t
have any evidence that
00:18:55.000 --> 00:18:59.999
umm… personal and private property is the only
answer. I know of regimes in which common property
00:19:00.000 --> 00:19:04.999
and common ownership by the
community of forests, and waters,
00:19:05.000 --> 00:19:09.999
and streams, and uh… grasslands
uh… worked very well.
00:19:10.000 --> 00:19:14.999
In fact, they worked better than privately owned
ones. It\'s a sense of ownership, sense of ownership.
00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:19.999
That is important for protecting resources.
00:19:20.000 --> 00:19:24.999
The arguments of the American Right may
yet derail the Johannesburg Summit.
00:19:25.000 --> 00:19:29.999
But they\'re still a minority view even in the West.
After the attacks on America on 11th September,
00:19:30.000 --> 00:19:34.999
many in the rich countries felt a renewed sense
of community with the rest of the world,
00:19:35.000 --> 00:19:39.999
and were reminded the rest of the world\'s
problems cannot be safely ignored.
00:19:40.000 --> 00:19:44.999
At the recent Summit in Monterey, Mexico on
financing development, a prelude to Jo\'burg,
00:19:45.000 --> 00:19:49.999
sustainable development
was back on the agenda.
00:19:50.000 --> 00:19:54.999
I think most people now recognise that
problem is in developing countries,
00:19:55.000 --> 00:19:59.999
and issues which confront them are
not just limited to those countries,
00:20:00.000 --> 00:20:04.999
but globalisation basically means that we\'re all
living in each others world. And that being the case,
00:20:05.000 --> 00:20:09.999
I think there\'s a much greater readiness today
to consider assisting other parts of the world.
00:20:10.000 --> 00:20:14.999
And that came through in Monterey where there
was evidence on the part of the European Union,
00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:19.999
and on the United States that they were
prepared to increase development assistance.
00:20:20.000 --> 00:20:24.999
I think I must welcome my lovely guest…
00:20:25.000 --> 00:20:29.999
At the grass roots, too, there are signs the Johannesburg
Summit is once again catching the imagination.
00:20:30.000 --> 00:20:34.999
Tune into Nankie\'s station, and you\'re
more than likely to hear a discussion
00:20:35.000 --> 00:20:39.999
with the latest NGO or non-governmental
organisation. … new non-governmental organisation.
00:20:40.000 --> 00:20:44.999
NGOs not just in Alex but across the world
00:20:45.000 --> 00:20:49.999
are now preparing enthusiastically
for the Jo\'burg Summit.
00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:54.999
Well, we\'re expecting as many NGOs particularly
the NGOs that deal with development,
00:20:55.000 --> 00:20:59.999
NGOs that deal with environment issues,
greens. So we\'re really expecting
00:21:00.000 --> 00:21:04.999
to be a microcosm of the world.
00:21:05.000 --> 00:21:09.999
At the grass roots level, some very encouraging things have
been happening. I\'ll meet all over the world with young people,
00:21:10.000 --> 00:21:14.999
thousands of young people who are on
fire with it, who are just committed
00:21:15.000 --> 00:21:19.999
to… to… to the need to take a
hand in shaping their own future,
00:21:20.000 --> 00:21:24.999
to some degree disappointed
that we\'re not doing it!
00:21:25.000 --> 00:21:29.999
But NGOs like those which flourish in the streets around
Alex FM are increasingly seen by the American Right
00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:34.999
as throwbacks to 60s socialism, one more reason
why they see the Jo\'burg Summit as a threat.
00:21:35.000 --> 00:21:39.999
Well, given the current nature
00:21:40.000 --> 00:21:44.999
of the NGO movement, which is probably the
largest statist element in the world today,
00:21:45.000 --> 00:21:49.999
I think Johannesburg has
the potential of being a…
00:21:50.000 --> 00:21:54.999
a great disaster because it
embodies… and essentially
00:21:55.000 --> 00:21:59.999
all of the bad ideas in the world today have
sorted of melted away in most institutions
00:22:00.000 --> 00:22:04.999
but they are now totally embodied in the NGO Movement.
Well, I fear is that out of Johannesburg will come
00:22:05.000 --> 00:22:09.999
a whole series of… of…
of moves to try to argue
00:22:10.000 --> 00:22:14.999
that rather than integrate the environment
into the system that works in marketplace,
00:22:15.000 --> 00:22:19.999
we will create a permanent barrier from environmental
issues ever being integrated into the market
00:22:20.000 --> 00:22:24.999
that will ensure that the environmental
problems will persist which will mean that
00:22:25.000 --> 00:22:29.999
the… the solutions or the governmental
interference strategies that these people promote
00:22:30.000 --> 00:22:34.999
will have more and more validity each year. The problems will
exist because they will have prevented them from being solved.
00:22:35.000 --> 00:22:39.999
Still as the ideologues behind the
Earth Summit play out their moves,
00:22:40.000 --> 00:22:44.999
Nankie and her friends in Alexandra have their own
hopes for the Sustainable Development Summit.
00:22:45.000 --> 00:22:49.999
Their main aim in a way is to see they…
00:22:50.000 --> 00:22:54.999
that the improvement of the lives of
people in general around the… the world
00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:59.999
and around the countries, in the communities, they want to see people
living a better life whereby people will be proud of themselves.
00:23:00.000 --> 00:23:04.999
[sil.]
00:23:05.000 --> 00:23:09.999
I think it would help if we didn\'t had shacks, if
we had a very, that if we had trees, most trees
00:23:10.000 --> 00:23:14.999
and a cooling environment for everybody.
And you get to live in your own yard,
00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:19.999
get your own kind of privacy… that\'s
the kind of life, I would choose.
00:23:20.000 --> 00:23:24.999
Small hopes, just the kind
of realistic ambition,
00:23:25.000 --> 00:23:29.999
you\'d think the Johannesburg Summit could achieve. But
as the organisers of the Earth Summit in Rio found out,
00:23:30.000 --> 00:23:34.999
even if promises can be agreed, you still
can\'t count on them being delivered.
00:23:35.000 --> 00:23:39.999
I\'m deeply concerned that
there\'s too much talk
00:23:40.000 --> 00:23:44.999
and too little action.
00:23:45.000 --> 00:23:49.999
And there are plenty, plenty of meetings
and conferences at every level,
00:23:50.000 --> 00:23:54.999
ministerial, technicians,
scientists, Heads of State.
00:23:55.000 --> 00:23:59.999
I\'m feeling disappointed in
the fact that we never come
00:24:00.000 --> 00:24:04.999
up with a programme of
action which is do-able
00:24:05.000 --> 00:24:09.999
in a certain period of time
specific, five years, ten years,
00:24:10.000 --> 00:24:14.999
and I\'m saying do-able, costed,
00:24:15.000 --> 00:24:19.999
and identifying who is doing
what in the implementation,
00:24:20.000 --> 00:24:24.999
and who is going to pay what. Without that, it
will continue to be the same jazz ever year,
00:24:25.000 --> 00:24:29.999
and every conference we meet.
D.J. Nankie walks home
00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:34.999
through the kind of neighbourhood, the
Johannesburg Summit is meant to help.
00:24:35.000 --> 00:24:39.999
For its opponents, the Summit is a misguided
attempt to reheat ideas of state interference.
00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:44.999
For skeptics, another round of
banquets, and insincere promises.
00:24:45.000 --> 00:24:49.999
But for some, it could also be a
last chance for a very simple
00:24:50.000 --> 00:24:54.999
and old-fashioned ideal.
00:24:55.000 --> 00:24:59.999
And one must speak quite plainly,
00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:04.999
there\'s a moral objection, there\'s
a moral damage that comes
00:25:05.000 --> 00:25:09.999
from placing one\'s personal interest,
00:25:10.000 --> 00:25:14.999
and a country\'s personal stake ahead
00:25:15.000 --> 00:25:19.999
of one\'s sense of humanity
for those who are suffering
00:25:20.000 --> 00:25:24.999
from all of the things that
are brought on by poverty.
00:25:25.000 --> 00:25:29.999
We should not doubt that the
national escape from poverty
00:25:30.000 --> 00:25:34.999
and the individual escape from poverty
are marred by a certain negligence,
00:25:35.000 --> 00:25:39.999
a certain selfishness.
00:25:40.000 --> 00:25:44.999
I wish people were not
that way but they are.
00:25:45.000 --> 00:25:49.999
What\'s your message to the world
leaders gathering in Johannesburg
00:25:50.000 --> 00:25:54.999
for this summit on sustainable development?
My message would be
00:25:55.000 --> 00:25:59.999
a very old and very commonplace one
00:26:00.000 --> 00:26:04.999
that there\'s nothing so important
00:26:05.000 --> 00:26:09.999
as narrowing the gap between
the rich world, and the poor,
00:26:10.000 --> 00:26:14.999
particularly, by continued,
00:26:15.000 --> 00:26:19.999
and well considered help to the economic,
00:26:20.000 --> 00:26:24.999
and social development, and stability
00:26:25.000 --> 00:26:29.999
of the poorer countries.
There\'s no unseen formula
00:26:30.000 --> 00:26:34.999
that replaces
00:26:35.000 --> 00:26:40.000
a much stronger effort
than we are already doing.