The artist, intellectual and storyteller John Berger is the subject of…
Kentridge and Dumas in Conversation
- Description
- Reviews
- Citation
- Cataloging
- Transcript
If you are not affiliated with a college or university, and are interested in watching this film, please register as an individual and login to rent this film. Already registered? Login to rent this film. This film is also available on our home streaming platform, OVID.tv.
In this film, William Kentridge and Marlene Dumas – two of the most celebrated names in international contemporary art – come face to face in a series of frank, witty and intense discussions about their work and practice. The film follows them from the gentle ambience of a dinner conversation, to their studios – where we are given insight into the way that each artist works – to some of their finished works and installations. What emerges is how very differently these two highly successful South African artists approach image making. Dumas’ method is deeply intuitive – she often works on the floor as though embracing her paintings, pouring and dabbing paint to produce her remarkable portraits. Kentridge is intensely systematic, alternating gestural mark making with the repetitive action of drawing-filming-erasing for his animated films.
There are, however, striking similarities between the two. Kentridge and Dumas are figural artists, in whose work the human figure occupies an important position, both suggesting and giving rise to some of the central concerns of their respective oeuvres. Dumas analyzes and explores the human face and body, seeking to convey mood and character, to understand individuality and human experience in all its myriad forms. Kentridge treats the human form as a kind of landscape. In his animated films, figures arise from and merge into the physical environment so that Kentridge’s exploration of form is never separated from his desire to understand the context that gives rise to character. It may be one of those strange flukes of history that these two internationally acclaimed artists were born in South Africa, just two years apart: Dumas in Cape Town in 1953 and Kentridge in Johannesburg in 1955.
KENTRIDGE AND DUMAS IN CONVERSATION shows the two artists engaged in intense discussion about drawing, painting and filmmaking, and includes footage of the artists in their studios and of their works.
“Recommended! Honest and heartfelt; captures in a natural way the two at work, taking us inside their techniques and processes.” —Sebastian Derry, Educational Media Reviews Online (EMRO)
Citation
Main credits
Kentridge, William (interviewee (expression))
Dumas, Marlene (interviewee (expression))
Meyburgh, Catherine (film director)
Meyburgh, Catherine (editor of moving image work)
Hoff, Jason (film producer)
Essers, Liza (film producer)
Other credits
Cinematographers, Mark Rowlston [and 4 others]; music composer, Philip Miller.
Distributor subjects
Art; South Africa; Cultural Anthropology; Biographies; Cultural Studies; Jewish Studies; Media Studies; Women’s StudiesKeywords
WEBVTT
00:00:04.420 --> 00:00:10.693
[music]
00:00:10.860 --> 00:00:11.933
-The kitchen is so messy.
00:00:12.100 --> 00:00:12.893
-Oh my God.
00:00:13.060 --> 00:00:14.500
-Plastic bags.
00:00:15.080 --> 00:00:16.140
That\'s the chicken.
00:00:25.580 --> 00:00:27.500
-Where shall we start?
00:00:28.140 --> 00:00:32.740
You can always interrupt me
when I talk as I will interrupt you also.
00:00:33.740 --> 00:00:36.380
[background conversation]
00:00:36.740 --> 00:00:38.340
-I think I know that really.
00:00:40.740 --> 00:00:45.413
-For me standing here
I feel very emotional and vulnerable.
00:00:45.580 --> 00:00:50.340
I feel almost like the first time
I got a teaching job in Holland.
00:00:54.900 --> 00:00:59.133
I start to talk and I say,
\"I come from South Africa.
00:00:59.300 --> 00:01:01.500
I do all my confessions.\"
00:01:01.820 --> 00:01:05.013
I say, \"I gave you this problem,
that problem,
00:01:05.180 --> 00:01:05.893
and that problem.\"
00:01:06.060 --> 00:01:09.540
They stand like that
and I said, \"Don\'t you have any problems?\"
00:01:10.300 --> 00:01:13.453
I\'ve been asked different
questions hundreds of times
00:01:13.620 --> 00:01:16.693
by now and every time
it depends on which stage of your life,
00:01:16.860 --> 00:01:19.060
sometimes there\'s a different answer.
00:01:19.340 --> 00:01:22.693
That\'s also why it\'s very difficult
to find just one answer
00:01:22.860 --> 00:01:26.060
because I don\'t think there
is only one answer.
00:01:26.420 --> 00:01:27.580
-The fork.
00:01:28.220 --> 00:01:29.853
-6, 9, 10.
00:01:30.020 --> 00:01:32.813
-Whether you are well known
or not well well-known
00:01:32.980 --> 00:01:36.540
the things that interest you
and gives you problems,
00:01:36.820 --> 00:01:40.060
they will always stay that way.
00:01:51.220 --> 00:01:53.133
-The gate to the left.
00:01:53.300 --> 00:01:55.860
-I think I see a man
against the light here.
00:01:57.660 --> 00:01:58.420
Hey.
00:01:58.780 --> 00:01:59.580
-Hi.
00:01:59.860 --> 00:02:05.053
-I don\'t believe I\'m telling you
that an enormous light shine in here.
00:02:05.220 --> 00:02:06.660
-I\'m sorry.
Oh my God, that\'s awful.
00:02:06.900 --> 00:02:07.733
-From me.
00:02:07.900 --> 00:02:09.973
-Okay, we\'ll regift it,
it\'s a [crosstalk]?
00:02:10.140 --> 00:02:12.913
-I think so we regift
because I want to share with you.
00:02:13.080 --> 00:02:13.673
I hope it\'s okay.
00:02:13.840 --> 00:02:16.213
I would very much
like to drink something.
00:02:16.380 --> 00:02:17.853
Where shall I put--
-Come inside.
00:02:18.020 --> 00:02:20.413
I\'m presuming wine
rather than whiskey but we have both.
00:02:20.580 --> 00:02:21.813
-No, no whiskey.
00:02:21.980 --> 00:02:23.280
-Then some wine.
00:02:23.580 --> 00:02:26.280
-Don\'t tell me you did this too?
00:02:26.820 --> 00:02:27.673
-Which these?
00:02:27.840 --> 00:02:28.213
-These.
-No, no.
00:02:28.380 --> 00:02:31.953
When I was in Italy our friends [?] said
it\'s ridiculous
00:02:32.120 --> 00:02:34.213
that I can\'t paint
and I had to come to Italy.
00:02:34.380 --> 00:02:36.140
They were going to give me
painting lessons.
00:02:36.500 --> 00:02:39.653
I kind of enjoyed painting them
and I thought I could be a Sunday painter.
00:02:39.820 --> 00:02:43.653
I could enjoy painting on the weekends
and that\'s the child, you\'ve got them.
00:02:43.820 --> 00:02:44.820
-You put them in this.
00:02:45.820 --> 00:02:48.540
-That\'s why they sit in the kitchen,
they are not shown anywhere else
00:02:49.020 --> 00:02:53.580
but also you know the [?] asparagus.
-The [?] which we also like.
00:02:54.260 --> 00:03:03.693
We say [?] you\'re ahead of me
because I\'m working up to the still life.
00:03:03.860 --> 00:03:05.133
-Working up to the still life.
00:03:05.300 --> 00:03:08.433
-Yes, because I think
all the things that I\'ve always said,
00:03:08.600 --> 00:03:10.653
I don\'t like or can\'t do now
00:03:10.820 --> 00:03:14.340
I think, \"Okay, it\'s a challenge,
maybe I don\'t know.\"
00:03:15.380 --> 00:03:28.900
[music]
00:03:29.740 --> 00:03:34.333
-I didn\'t want to be a painter
but I was always told I am a painter
00:03:34.500 --> 00:03:39.700
and in the end, I accepted
that maybe that is then what I am.
00:03:40.020 --> 00:03:42.733
-For me, I suppose it was okay
to not be a painter.
00:03:42.900 --> 00:03:45.973
For me, the important thing was
discovering some context
00:03:46.140 --> 00:03:48.320
in which it was okay
for me not to have to paint
00:03:49.100 --> 00:03:51.333
but when I say I was relieved to discover
00:03:51.500 --> 00:03:52.900
that I didn\'t have to be a painter,
00:03:53.180 --> 00:03:54.933
it wasn\'t because I didn\'t want
to be a painter.
00:03:55.100 --> 00:03:58.133
I absolutely wanted to be a painter
but it is certain everyone
00:03:58.300 --> 00:04:02.100
has to understand the power
of incompetence for not being there.
00:04:02.660 --> 00:04:05.653
For years when I was drawing,
I said, \"Okay, I\'m drawing now
00:04:05.820 --> 00:04:09.340
but one day I will use canvas
and oil again then I\'ll be a real artist.
00:04:09.980 --> 00:04:12.573
I was dragged kicking
and screaming by other people to say,
00:04:12.740 --> 00:04:15.853
\"It\'s okay to be making
a film that can also be art.\"
00:04:16.020 --> 00:04:18.773
-I was always jealous of the filmmakers
00:04:18.940 --> 00:04:21.493
because I really
thought beautiful paintings
00:04:21.660 --> 00:04:24.333
has been made but I thought there
was a incompetence
00:04:24.500 --> 00:04:29.340
in painting actually
which I really admired in filmmakers.
00:04:29.620 --> 00:04:33.613
The young people
also they all really relate very well
00:04:33.780 --> 00:04:34.620
to your work.
00:04:34.860 --> 00:04:36.053
They all want to make animations now.
00:04:36.220 --> 00:04:38.740
-I know there is so much animation.
00:04:39.180 --> 00:05:29.293
[music]
00:05:29.460 --> 00:05:33.353
-When I first saw
your ink wash heads I had the feeling,
00:05:33.520 --> 00:05:36.980
\"Damn, if only I\'d thought of that.\"
00:05:37.420 --> 00:05:40.453
It was the saying, oh,
it\'s okay it all makes complete sense.
00:05:40.620 --> 00:05:44.133
I understand the logic, the impulse,
the pleasure
00:05:44.300 --> 00:05:45.660
whereas the paintings themselves.
00:05:45.900 --> 00:05:48.693
I\'ll go, \"Okay, that\'s not a medium,
I\'ll begin to know how to use.\"
00:05:48.860 --> 00:05:50.580
I work in a very different way.
00:05:53.140 --> 00:05:56.173
The pleasures of charcoal for me
was that it was alterable.
00:05:56.340 --> 00:05:59.453
That you could because it\'s very soft
you just wipe it with your hand
00:05:59.620 --> 00:06:02.500
or with a cloth and you\'ve erased 80%
of what you\'ve done.
00:06:02.780 --> 00:06:06.373
One of the things that I couldn\'t deal
with painting was that I couldn\'t work out
00:06:06.540 --> 00:06:07.620
how to alter a painting,
00:06:07.900 --> 00:06:09.933
how to deal with the wetness,
how to actually--
00:06:10.100 --> 00:06:11.173
-I wipe it off too.
00:06:11.340 --> 00:06:13.213
-A lot of it looks
like it\'s done and that\'s it.
00:06:13.380 --> 00:06:17.933
-Well, with the watercolor the thing is
indeed to do it as quickly as possible
00:06:18.100 --> 00:06:20.373
but some of my paintings
that is much thicker
00:06:20.540 --> 00:06:27.860
it is so thick because I changed my mind
but I never wait for the painting to dry
00:06:28.340 --> 00:06:29.813
because I\'m too impatient.
00:06:29.980 --> 00:06:32.780
The fact that I wipe off
a lot with the tabs
00:06:33.180 --> 00:06:36.573
is actually a way
of almost like you use your--
00:06:36.740 --> 00:06:38.460
-Erasing them.
00:06:39.140 --> 00:06:44.220
-Sometimes at last in the middle
of the late-night
00:06:44.740 --> 00:06:50.300
something can sometimes come together
it can happen very quickly.
00:06:50.980 --> 00:07:02.260
[music]
00:07:02.740 --> 00:07:06.060
-Yes, we are working
on our production of Wozzeck
00:07:06.460 --> 00:07:09.053
so the studio is taken
over into a theater rehearsal room
00:07:09.220 --> 00:07:10.980
at the moment
so there\'s nothing on the room.
00:07:11.300 --> 00:07:13.773
This is the set for Wozzeck.
00:07:13.940 --> 00:07:17.260
I either put the camera up there
and film down, hanging.
00:07:17.940 --> 00:07:20.573
It\'s sometimes in the middle
of the room, the wall there.
00:07:20.740 --> 00:07:25.020
-This I did see but on photographs,
you can never see things properly.
00:07:25.300 --> 00:07:26.740
-It looks enormous from the photo.
00:07:26.980 --> 00:07:27.773
-Mine?
-Yes.
00:07:27.940 --> 00:07:32.373
-Oh, no, no, mine is very low ceiling,
and have you seen the photograph
00:07:32.540 --> 00:07:34.060
of my [crosstalk]
-It\'s in the catalog.
00:07:34.660 --> 00:07:35.660
-No, no, no.
00:07:35.860 --> 00:07:38.653
They tell you if you draw
in that where do you sit then?
00:07:38.820 --> 00:07:39.813
Do you sit at the table?
00:07:39.980 --> 00:07:42.973
-Usually I have a stand
at a wall and draw on the wall.
00:07:43.140 --> 00:07:44.740
The whole wall is soft board.
00:07:45.560 --> 00:07:46.933
You can paint anywhere around the--
00:07:47.100 --> 00:07:49.093
that\'s the [?]
-At last we got something in common.
00:07:49.260 --> 00:07:51.613
-That is the vital thing
to understand that every surface
00:07:51.780 --> 00:07:52.860
is a pinboard
00:07:53.260 --> 00:07:55.773
because before I just spent
so much time re-sticking
00:07:55.940 --> 00:07:58.820
and moving and shifting
and here just to be able to.
00:08:02.020 --> 00:08:03.693
The house I\'m in is the house
of my parents
00:08:03.860 --> 00:08:06.333
so there are still kitchen cupboards
full of objects
00:08:06.500 --> 00:08:10.540
and sometimes even food from the 1960s
that have kind of been forgotten about.
00:08:10.860 --> 00:08:13.053
Objects which are either going
to get turned into sculptures
00:08:13.220 --> 00:08:17.193
or become part of theater projects
and acts and 19th-century egg whisks
00:08:17.360 --> 00:08:21.220
from a shop in France which became
a Herrera woman in Black Box.
00:08:21.980 --> 00:08:47.140
[music]
00:09:11.340 --> 00:09:20.293
-This is my studio before
that I had for 25 years or more.
00:09:20.460 --> 00:09:24.293
I had a smaller space in which I drew
00:09:24.460 --> 00:09:29.540
and I used a soft board there,
00:09:30.260 --> 00:09:34.033
that was one of my things
and I used for putting.
00:09:34.200 --> 00:09:37.973
I worked on the floor of the drawings
and then I would put them
00:09:38.140 --> 00:09:44.820
on the walls with pins or push pins.
00:09:46.380 --> 00:09:48.653
You would go from the floor to the wall
and that\'s why they also have
00:09:48.820 --> 00:09:51.940
a lot of holes in them
because I would look at them as I--
00:12:00.420 --> 00:12:04.573
-The whole place is newspapers
00:12:04.740 --> 00:12:09.620
that I still wanted to go through to see
the images in the newspapers
00:12:10.020 --> 00:12:13.053
and other clippings and clippings
that got reordered
00:12:13.220 --> 00:12:16.333
and that it is basically
all two-dimensional things.
00:12:16.500 --> 00:12:18.293
-Do you have folders,
which is like heads?
00:12:18.460 --> 00:12:19.893
-[giggles]
Yes, yes.
00:12:20.060 --> 00:12:20.773
I try--
00:12:20.940 --> 00:12:24.260
-Even though it\'s scattered,
it\'s a sense in which it\'s locatable.
00:12:24.580 --> 00:12:28.433
-Yes. That\'s why I also don\'t
like people cleaning up my places so.
00:12:28.600 --> 00:12:31.053
I don\'t want them to [crosstalk] things.
00:12:31.220 --> 00:12:33.653
-I see that in the park people
would have had sketchbooks
00:12:33.820 --> 00:12:38.020
where they would have had this record
of faces or heads or things they\'d seen.
00:12:38.220 --> 00:12:40.573
-But you still make sketches
though in little notebooks?
00:12:40.740 --> 00:12:44.173
-No, sometimes,
most of my sketchbooks have got phrases
00:12:44.340 --> 00:12:47.013
or sentences rather than drawings.
00:12:47.180 --> 00:12:48.620
[music]
00:13:00.900 --> 00:13:03.293
-We have to try to imagine
how do you find him
00:13:03.460 --> 00:13:05.653
that he believes the thoughts
are coming out of his head.
00:13:05.820 --> 00:13:07.860
Let\'s be more onstage, I think.
00:13:08.080 --> 00:13:11.140
Looking on stage, yes.
-[?]
00:13:13.700 --> 00:13:14.700
-I think so.
00:13:18.340 --> 00:13:20.700
We\'re just re-rehearsing Wozzeck now
00:13:21.700 --> 00:13:24.133
and suddenly as I had forgotten
as we did that 15 years ago,
00:13:24.300 --> 00:13:28.093
all sorts of images, characters,
things in it have been repeated
00:13:28.260 --> 00:13:30.773
for the last 15 years,
which I\'d forgotten about.
00:13:30.940 --> 00:13:32.453
Each time we think it\'s a new idea.
00:13:32.620 --> 00:13:35.293
You think, \"Oh, I\'m doing a new picture,
I haven\'t done this before.\"
00:13:35.460 --> 00:13:36.693
-Yes, yes.
-When it\'s finished, you say,
00:13:36.860 --> 00:13:38.133
\"Oh my God, I did the same thing here
00:13:38.300 --> 00:13:40.180
and there and there, all the way around.\"
00:13:40.740 --> 00:13:42.653
The actors that are pressed into service,
00:13:42.820 --> 00:13:46.220
the same troupe of actors that have
to come and perform every night.
00:13:48.380 --> 00:13:50.700
-I must get out of here.
-Must get out of here.
00:13:53.780 --> 00:13:55.853
-I think of something
to put damn rhinoceros
00:13:56.020 --> 00:13:58.053
that goes through my different work.
00:13:58.220 --> 00:13:59.573
I think for God\'s sake,
put me out to pasture
00:13:59.740 --> 00:14:01.813
and then another film comes
and he gets dragged
00:14:01.980 --> 00:14:03.940
out again,
he\'s got to do a series of tricks.
00:14:15.020 --> 00:14:19.420
-With me, the little girl appears
sometimes before I had a daughter,
00:14:19.660 --> 00:14:22.133
not exactly the same,
but things come back.
00:14:22.300 --> 00:14:25.893
If there\'s a period say,
maybe of more sexual things,
00:14:26.060 --> 00:14:32.653
there is maybe afterwards then it could be
that it becomes more somber again.
00:14:32.820 --> 00:14:45.373
[music]
00:14:45.540 --> 00:14:48.460
It\'s the painter
who taught me one of the things
00:14:48.680 --> 00:14:50.733
he said, \"Painting was about color.
00:14:50.900 --> 00:14:53.340
If you can\'t use color,
you\'re not a painter.\"
00:14:53.820 --> 00:14:57.573
That used to upset me quite a lot
because at that stage,
00:14:57.740 --> 00:14:59.973
I used color but I just used any color.
00:15:00.140 --> 00:15:02.573
It wasn\'t really that there\'s
that you\'re often seen
00:15:02.740 --> 00:15:06.293
many paintings of people,
they use a lot of color.
00:15:06.460 --> 00:15:08.700
You can\'t really say it\'s about color.
00:15:12.940 --> 00:15:15.580
Some of my paintings
are actually very graphic,
00:15:15.860 --> 00:15:17.980
they\'re much more about light and dark.
00:15:22.360 --> 00:15:26.453
Then other paintings, when you see them
in the real it\'s actually the color
00:15:26.620 --> 00:15:28.020
that makes the difference.
00:15:28.620 --> 00:15:41.540
[music]
00:15:41.740 --> 00:15:46.013
Certain colors I don\'t use
so often I like to use blues
00:15:46.180 --> 00:15:47.780
for example and so.
00:15:48.540 --> 00:15:51.733
Colors as I said, it\'s so strong
that if you have a red face it
00:15:51.900 --> 00:15:54.660
whether it\'s a good painting
or a bad painting,
00:15:54.980 --> 00:15:58.213
it takes up its place.
00:15:58.380 --> 00:16:04.580
I find red difficult, I use it sparingly
because it can really take over actually.
00:16:05.180 --> 00:16:10.093
In the illustration,
say in the red would stand for blood,
00:16:10.260 --> 00:16:15.213
but red is not always blood,
just as white is not always a race,
00:16:15.380 --> 00:16:16.580
it can be a color.
00:16:16.860 --> 00:16:21.213
Then if, say, for some reason,
most of the paint is finished
00:16:21.380 --> 00:16:24.540
and there is only certain browns
or grays left,
00:16:24.980 --> 00:16:27.933
then I can also make
a painting out of that.
00:16:28.100 --> 00:16:54.140
[music]
00:16:54.420 --> 00:16:56.573
-I used red, which I draw with myself
because then you\'ve got bad,
00:16:56.740 --> 00:16:58.733
it\'s like a photograph
that you\'ve got to photograph
00:16:58.900 --> 00:17:00.213
the charcoal drawing is the photograph.
00:17:00.380 --> 00:17:02.693
Then you\'ve got forensic notes
on top of the photograph.
00:17:02.860 --> 00:17:05.573
You\'d have that with a white marker
or something drawn on top.
00:17:05.740 --> 00:17:10.060
Just to differentiate those marks
from the drawing underneath.
00:17:12.860 --> 00:17:19.620
[music]
00:17:19.860 --> 00:17:22.933
It\'s very rare that I use
the footage that filmed in color,
00:17:23.100 --> 00:17:24.213
it\'s usually drained of color.
00:17:24.380 --> 00:17:26.253
But when I do not use color,
it\'s usually found color
00:17:26.420 --> 00:17:27.500
I trust as a palette.
00:17:27.900 --> 00:17:30.113
Most of the paintings
that I admire are full of color
00:17:30.280 --> 00:17:31.560
or have color not full of color.
00:17:32.020 --> 00:17:33.740
It\'s not saying oh I really like,
00:17:34.140 --> 00:17:37.573
it\'s absolutely not saying oh the pictures
I like are pictures that look like mine.
00:17:37.740 --> 00:17:40.420
Usually, pictures that look like mine
I want to keep far away from.
00:17:40.700 --> 00:17:43.693
So you look at a shot and
a still life that uses color
00:17:43.860 --> 00:17:46.500
like that or a piece of Alaska cloth.
00:17:46.860 --> 00:17:49.980
They\'ve got to be able
to work with color in that way.
00:17:50.260 --> 00:17:51.053
Yes, it\'s a sense of regret.
00:17:51.220 --> 00:17:54.613
I would also love to be able to sing
or play a musical instrument
00:17:54.780 --> 00:17:56.700
and it seems as far away as that.
00:17:57.380 --> 00:18:01.420
In the end, I\'m sorry I can\'t sing
but it doesn\'t keep me awake at night.
00:18:01.700 --> 00:18:18.540
[music]
00:18:18.780 --> 00:18:21.193
In a way directing,
I\'m sure the understanding
00:18:21.360 --> 00:18:26.533
of landscape always felt different
from conventional views of landscape.
00:18:26.700 --> 00:18:31.453
European images of water, of leafy trees,
of mountains, all the traditional things
00:18:31.620 --> 00:18:32.980
are nothing so easy.
00:18:33.380 --> 00:18:36.060
Landscape painting,
none of which were there in Johannesburg.
00:18:37.300 --> 00:18:38.673
There\'s certainly something
about Johannesburg
00:18:38.840 --> 00:18:41.733
that influenced thinking about kinds
of drawings that can be made.
00:18:41.900 --> 00:18:44.213
What is it to draw a mind dump
rather than a mountain
00:18:44.380 --> 00:18:47.780
or a culvert rather than a river?
00:18:48.980 --> 00:19:06.940
[ocean waves sound]
00:19:08.940 --> 00:19:13.853
-I don\'t draw the Dutch landscape
and I\'ve always didn\'t really feel.
00:19:14.020 --> 00:19:17.573
I indeed coming from Cape Town,
I miss a mountain.
00:19:17.740 --> 00:19:19.500
Amsterdam is so wet.
00:19:20.180 --> 00:19:25.133
You miss the crackling
of the dry grass and stuff like that.
00:19:25.300 --> 00:19:29.580
Even though this is not things
that I directly use in my work.
00:19:29.900 --> 00:19:32.633
One of the first sort of projects
at art school
00:19:32.800 --> 00:19:38.220
where we had to do something
about object transformed that actually,
00:19:38.460 --> 00:19:42.853
they took the human body
and I turned it into a landscape a bit,
00:19:43.020 --> 00:19:45.220
the navel, and the breasts.
00:19:45.500 --> 00:19:51.153
I then realized that maybe the effect
of the close-up in the paintings
00:19:51.320 --> 00:19:56.380
of the face becomes so big that the face
actually becomes the landscape.
00:19:56.940 --> 00:20:08.820
[music]
00:20:09.100 --> 00:20:11.820
-I never really wanted to paint the type.
00:20:12.100 --> 00:20:17.013
My idea was to have
every portrait different,
00:20:17.180 --> 00:20:22.013
even if that are in group together
that they still have to have
00:20:22.180 --> 00:20:23.493
a individuality.
00:20:23.660 --> 00:20:33.780
[music]
00:20:34.100 --> 00:20:35.853
-When I was a child,
I went to art lessons.
00:20:36.020 --> 00:20:37.133
We were taught by my--
00:20:37.300 --> 00:20:40.413
When I was 8, we were taught
that in a man,
00:20:40.580 --> 00:20:43.893
lines mean character
and in the drawing of a woman,
00:20:44.060 --> 00:20:45.100
lines mean age.
00:20:48.420 --> 00:20:51.733
For me, one of the great paintings was
when I saw the Stanley Spencer painting
00:20:51.900 --> 00:20:54.480
of himself and his wife
with The Leg of Mutton.
00:20:54.780 --> 00:20:59.253
It was the first time seeing a
woman painted with aging flesh
00:20:59.420 --> 00:21:03.580
and not breasts that stuck right up
but had the weight of gravity.
00:21:05.500 --> 00:21:08.133
For me it was a reassuring
that one could make a painting like that,
00:21:08.300 --> 00:21:09.613
that people existed like,
00:21:09.780 --> 00:21:12.593
so that in a way it gave an answer that,
yes, it\'s a very different way
00:21:12.760 --> 00:21:14.993
of looking at women
that doesn\'t just have to be
00:21:15.160 --> 00:21:17.820
in the paradigm of pearly smooth skin.
00:21:18.340 --> 00:21:21.533
-There was a time when
a certain blonde American girl
00:21:21.700 --> 00:21:22.900
was seen to be--
00:21:23.140 --> 00:21:25.873
She was always Miss World type of thing,
00:21:26.040 --> 00:21:29.820
but I actually now find
a lot of that, ugly.
00:21:30.940 --> 00:21:33.773
I think beauty is things also--
00:21:33.940 --> 00:21:36.573
When something loses
it\'s meaning for you,
00:21:36.740 --> 00:21:38.173
it becomes ugly also.
00:21:38.340 --> 00:21:42.300
It\'s not quite good enough,
but what one calls kitsch often.
00:21:42.620 --> 00:21:46.193
-I\'m trying to think also to distinguish
between the work of art
00:21:46.360 --> 00:21:48.193
and what is depicted.
-Yes, exactly.
00:21:48.360 --> 00:21:49.653
That\'s also important.
00:21:49.820 --> 00:21:53.213
-Beautiful David Goldblatt photograph
of what looks like a God-awful piece
00:21:53.380 --> 00:21:54.820
of dusty felt.
00:21:55.300 --> 00:21:58.620
When you\'ve seen the photograph,
does the felt itself become beautiful?
00:21:59.620 --> 00:22:03.820
Or can you say \"No, this is beautiful
but the referent is.\"
00:22:04.380 --> 00:22:47.980
[music]
00:22:48.220 --> 00:22:50.980
There\'s a series
of different skull drawings in Black Box
00:22:51.660 --> 00:22:54.373
which related to skulls being
sent back to Germany
00:22:54.540 --> 00:22:59.120
from the [?] being measured for deciding
what\'s the European skull,
00:22:59.460 --> 00:23:01.220
what\'s a black skull,
all of those questions.
00:23:02.580 --> 00:23:06.740
Those are based on photographs
of different skulls that I found.
00:23:09.500 --> 00:23:11.980
I tried to draw them conscientiously,
00:23:13.300 --> 00:23:14.893
but was I trying
to do beautiful drawings,
00:23:15.060 --> 00:23:17.740
no, I was trying to do drawings
that captured the skull
00:23:18.220 --> 00:23:21.213
and that had them drawn,
they were drawn on top of old ledger pages
00:23:21.380 --> 00:23:23.373
so there was something,
and certainly, I used that paper
00:23:23.540 --> 00:23:25.813
because there\'s something
that was very comfortable
00:23:25.980 --> 00:23:28.313
between them charcoal
and the surface of the paper,
00:23:28.480 --> 00:23:31.740
a slipperiness that made
a lot of light to come through.
00:23:34.580 --> 00:23:36.573
I said, \"Okay, they fit
into a tradition of people
00:23:36.740 --> 00:23:40.333
who\'ve painted or drawn skulls,
so it\'s not shocking like a baby.\"
00:23:40.500 --> 00:23:44.613
It\'s not a tradition of huge oversized,
naked newborn babies.
00:23:44.780 --> 00:23:48.133
It\'s not a tradition of images of that,
but it is a big tradition
00:23:48.300 --> 00:23:50.053
of what could be a horrific image.
00:23:50.220 --> 00:23:52.820
The newly fled bone of a head.
00:23:53.180 --> 00:23:59.373
[music]
00:23:59.540 --> 00:24:03.373
-With the babies, I do think
one of the main reasons people
00:24:03.540 --> 00:24:06.460
are a bit disturbed
is because they\'re so big.
00:24:07.140 --> 00:24:09.260
They\'re very big so psychologically--
00:24:09.660 --> 00:24:13.460
Oh, I just want to ask you,
do you find my babies ugly?
00:24:14.820 --> 00:24:15.713
-I think I do.
00:24:15.880 --> 00:24:17.220
[laughter]
00:24:18.140 --> 00:24:23.820
I don\'t know what it means.
[crosstalk]
00:24:24.820 --> 00:24:27.513
-Because it was from snapshots
from her after she was born.
00:24:27.680 --> 00:24:30.233
I think the snapshot
is much more frightening.
00:24:30.400 --> 00:24:35.913
The child can go and I think it\'s
also what you are used to in painting.
00:24:36.080 --> 00:24:37.520
It seems to--
-Absolutely.
00:24:38.300 --> 00:24:39.493
Is that a category you think of?
00:24:39.660 --> 00:24:41.113
Do you think,
\"Am I making a beautiful painting
00:24:41.280 --> 00:24:42.380
or an ugly painting?\"
No.
00:24:42.860 --> 00:24:43.533
Or do you?
00:24:43.700 --> 00:24:44.700
-No.
00:24:45.060 --> 00:24:48.573
-There\'s something in us that when we see
it and we get pleasure from it,
00:24:48.740 --> 00:24:49.273
we call it beauty.
00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:50.060
That\'s a--
00:24:50.380 --> 00:24:52.933
-I just want to say,
you just said this, so your definition,
00:24:53.100 --> 00:24:56.460
I just heard you said something
that gives one pleasure,
00:24:56.700 --> 00:24:58.173
we would call beautiful.
00:24:58.340 --> 00:25:01.500
-That\'s why I\'m saying, it feel feels
such an inadequate sense of what it is.
00:25:01.700 --> 00:25:06.460
When you see a Gericault
painting of guillotined heads,
00:25:06.940 --> 00:25:09.540
which is horrific and you say,
\"Why is that not terribly ugly?\"
00:25:09.940 --> 00:25:12.620
But one\'s response is just,
\"God, what a gorgeous painting.\"
00:25:12.980 --> 00:25:15.013
For me, it wouldn\'t be
a contradiction to say,
00:25:15.180 --> 00:25:17.613
this is so beautiful, this is so ugly
00:25:17.780 --> 00:25:19.940
that both one could say
both of those statements
00:25:20.380 --> 00:25:22.340
and accommodate both at the same time.
00:25:22.660 --> 00:25:26.500
Beauty as a counterpoint to ugliness,
doesn\'t really work for me.
00:25:26.940 --> 00:25:32.133
[music]
00:25:32.300 --> 00:25:35.300
-A painting needs a wall to object to.
00:25:35.540 --> 00:25:41.093
[music]
00:25:41.260 --> 00:25:46.180
If you look at it, you will see
that actually she doesn\'t have a nose,
00:25:48.860 --> 00:25:51.853
because the paint
suggests certain things.
00:25:52.020 --> 00:25:54.453
You see those things,
but they are not always
00:25:54.620 --> 00:25:57.220
even really definedly there,
00:25:57.460 --> 00:26:02.013
certain things that you think you\'ve seen,
but it isn\'t actually there.
00:26:02.180 --> 00:26:06.300
I make a suggestion through the paint
and then you start to see that.
00:26:06.540 --> 00:26:15.380
[music]
00:26:15.580 --> 00:26:18.753
-Generally in the books or in paintings,
the thing that I\'m interested in,
00:26:18.920 --> 00:26:22.100
or that comes back to other riddles
that you can\'t completely solve,
00:26:22.740 --> 00:26:26.300
whether it\'s a formal thing,
the shape of a leaf in a Mattise painting,
00:26:26.860 --> 00:26:28.900
why is that leaf square
and the others are oval
00:26:29.340 --> 00:26:33.860
or odd riddles that are there
that don\'t quite ever make sense,
00:26:34.180 --> 00:26:38.233
but wanting to shift that
into coherence is the needle
00:26:38.400 --> 00:26:42.140
that keeps pulling you back
to relooking at the painting.
00:26:43.060 --> 00:26:45.533
I suppose the long-term hope
or the long-term trajectory
00:26:45.700 --> 00:26:47.053
of a lot of the films
that I make is that,
00:26:47.220 --> 00:26:49.593
they\'re neither meaningless
nor do they have a meaning
00:26:49.760 --> 00:26:51.233
that can be fixed and it\'s the belief
00:26:51.400 --> 00:26:53.360
that there is something
that is between those two.
00:26:53.580 --> 00:26:57.933
-Meaning is for me really
also a language term.
00:26:58.100 --> 00:26:59.653
Meaning comes afterwards.
00:26:59.820 --> 00:27:04.940
You give meaning to something.
00:27:05.300 --> 00:27:08.173
People write books
to explain what the work is about.
00:27:08.340 --> 00:27:12.780
Curators write statements
so people are all the time indeed
00:27:13.060 --> 00:27:17.813
using the written word
and the words actually
00:27:17.980 --> 00:27:19.460
to talk about visual things.
00:27:19.740 --> 00:27:23.020
I don\'t deny that
and I want to also play with that.
00:27:27.180 --> 00:27:30.253
Well, I hate that word in the Dutch
where they talk about artists
00:27:30.420 --> 00:27:33.493
and we say, \"You put someone
on the wrong leg or so,\"
00:27:33.660 --> 00:27:35.740
as if I deliberately want to--
00:27:36.160 --> 00:27:37.133
I know what I\'m doing,
00:27:37.300 --> 00:27:40.413
but I deliberately not going to tell you
because I\'m doing totally something else.
00:27:40.580 --> 00:27:43.180
That is not what one is talking about.
00:27:43.460 --> 00:27:46.973
Images are ambiguous in themselves.
00:27:47.140 --> 00:27:50.453
Also, I do want to give you the context,
because that was a good one
00:27:50.620 --> 00:27:54.020
in which the area
in which I\'m then thinking.
00:28:00.020 --> 00:28:04.333
This is a mixture of images
of the last photographs
00:28:04.500 --> 00:28:10.220
that some of the suicide bombers
that they had taken of themselves.
00:28:11.260 --> 00:28:15.693
They were relatively so young
and vulnerable and they decided to,
00:28:15.860 --> 00:28:16.693
\"This is the cause.\"
00:28:16.860 --> 00:28:20.180
And you also would
like to live when you are young,
00:28:20.380 --> 00:28:23.133
but among them there\'s also--
00:28:23.300 --> 00:28:27.420
This was the boyfriend
of my daughter at that time,
00:28:27.980 --> 00:28:29.933
as soon as someone gets grouped together
00:28:30.100 --> 00:28:33.700
as a group, then they all start
to look the same.
00:28:34.380 --> 00:28:35.973
It\'s not that the meaning is so open.
00:28:36.140 --> 00:28:37.353
I wouldn\'t like someone to look at them
00:28:37.520 --> 00:28:41.740
and say,
\"Oh, what horrible looking people.\"
00:28:41.980 --> 00:28:50.413
I want to at least give you
my bit of the way I see to start with,
00:28:50.580 --> 00:28:51.220
but I mean--
00:28:51.740 --> 00:28:54.493
-I suppose it\'s a question of,
can one have meaning that\'s not reductive?
00:28:54.660 --> 00:28:58.453
Can one have the idea that meaning
is as open-ended as the work itself?
00:28:58.620 --> 00:29:00.493
There\'s sometimes
incredibly different readings
00:29:00.660 --> 00:29:01.333
of the work that somebody says,
00:29:01.500 --> 00:29:06.940
\"Well, why did you draw a white woman
in that film, Felix in Exile?\"
00:29:08.020 --> 00:29:13.660
And I can say to them, \"Well, in fact,
the model for that was a black woman,
00:29:14.180 --> 00:29:16.653
but in fact the person
on the drawing is charcoal.
00:29:16.820 --> 00:29:18.300
She\'s neither black nor white.\"
00:29:19.260 --> 00:29:23.580
But in that sense
it\'s absolutely somebody seeing it
00:29:23.860 --> 00:29:24.860
in a certain way.
00:29:25.740 --> 00:29:29.093
Sometimes yes, people want them
to be different and they\'re saying,
00:29:29.260 --> 00:29:30.613
\"When you\'re drawing Johannesburg,
that\'s fine.\"
00:29:30.780 --> 00:29:32.053
As soon as you\'re
not drawing Johannesburg,
00:29:32.220 --> 00:29:33.540
you don\'t know what you\'re doing.
00:29:34.100 --> 00:29:45.893
[music]
00:29:46.060 --> 00:29:48.260
-My drawings is called Like Drawings.
00:29:48.620 --> 00:29:52.213
This is a group
where all-white-people is excluded.
00:29:52.380 --> 00:29:58.293
It\'s only black faces and the first time
it was exhibited in Holland,
00:29:58.460 --> 00:30:02.293
that immediately said,
they put it in apartheid context.
00:30:02.460 --> 00:30:08.253
They also thought that these people
were all looked like victims, for example.
00:30:08.420 --> 00:30:15.373
I exhibited in America once
and then a big black man came up to me
00:30:15.540 --> 00:30:20.693
and then he said that he thought
that it was really very strong portraits.
00:30:20.860 --> 00:30:27.013
That he hadn\'t seen such strong portraits
of people being depicted.
00:30:27.180 --> 00:30:29.933
He did not go necessarily to that.
00:30:30.100 --> 00:30:34.613
It is wonderful sometimes
that you can be surprised.
00:30:34.780 --> 00:30:36.180
-At how people see things.
00:30:36.500 --> 00:30:37.893
-The description already.
00:30:38.060 --> 00:30:40.573
How someone says,
why is it such and such?
00:30:40.740 --> 00:30:42.140
It is not such.
00:30:42.500 --> 00:30:45.300
-I just want to know,
with your paintings, with your drawings,
00:30:45.780 --> 00:30:49.060
they all have
quite specific titles associated.
00:30:49.540 --> 00:30:51.873
Do they come long after
or sometimes you have a title
00:30:52.040 --> 00:30:53.513
before the painting or halfway through?
00:30:53.680 --> 00:30:55.460
-They mostly come afterwards.
00:30:55.660 --> 00:31:03.500
[music]
00:31:03.780 --> 00:31:06.740
The painting has to be able
to carry its title.
00:31:11.740 --> 00:31:13.293
The painting of my daughter.
00:31:13.460 --> 00:31:16.693
For a long time, I knew I wanted
to paint this picture of her
00:31:16.860 --> 00:31:19.300
standing there and she spent it herself.
00:31:19.660 --> 00:31:23.533
I thought of titles
like The Noble Savage, for example.
00:31:23.700 --> 00:31:26.733
I thought but that gives all wrong--
00:31:26.900 --> 00:31:27.493
-Associations.
00:31:27.660 --> 00:31:30.533
-I don\'t really want to go that way
but I did find it interesting
00:31:30.700 --> 00:31:33.933
that she\'s very young
and that she does have this sense
00:31:34.100 --> 00:31:35.453
of wanting to paint itself.
00:31:35.620 --> 00:31:38.660
I was struggling in these different areas.
00:31:46.060 --> 00:31:50.220
It is also like the painting of the face,
the painting of the body.
00:31:50.420 --> 00:31:53.493
I also thought of Picasso,
always the male artists
00:31:53.660 --> 00:31:58.500
are painting the woman
and so she was like a stand-in for me too.
00:31:58.820 --> 00:32:02.100
I thought, okay, the painter.
00:32:13.180 --> 00:32:15.220
-The project I was interested
in when I was thinking
00:32:15.900 --> 00:32:17.813
about what is in the news
that\'s been and gone.
00:32:17.980 --> 00:32:20.900
What are the points of connection
of that kind of ethnic cleansing?
00:32:21.100 --> 00:32:24.460
Now, the 1935 Italian campaign
in Ethiopia.
00:32:24.780 --> 00:32:26.973
Poison mustard gas
was used against Ethiopia.
00:32:27.140 --> 00:32:29.293
Which is something that was denied
by the Italian government
00:32:29.460 --> 00:32:30.980
until very recently.
00:32:31.220 --> 00:32:34.100
In fact, it\'s still denied by parts
of the Italian military.
00:32:34.700 --> 00:32:36.973
The film itself started off
just being interested
00:32:37.140 --> 00:32:39.453
in exploring what happens
with the cylindrical mirror.
00:32:39.620 --> 00:32:42.900
If you make a film using
anamorphic projections.
00:32:43.260 --> 00:32:46.540
Was it possible to make a film the way
that these drawings work?
00:32:47.700 --> 00:32:49.940
These drawings are then filmed from above
00:32:51.060 --> 00:32:53.100
and successively altered and changed.
00:32:53.500 --> 00:32:55.853
All that happens in the film
on the side is that these images
00:32:56.020 --> 00:32:57.093
then get projected back.
00:32:57.260 --> 00:32:58.500
Where there was a drawing,
00:32:58.780 --> 00:33:00.980
there\'s now a projection
and you see it in the mirror.
00:33:01.500 --> 00:33:03.773
You can see a trace here
of the bird that flies around.
00:33:03.940 --> 00:33:06.420
That got drawn and rubbed out and filmed.
00:33:06.700 --> 00:33:09.573
The hardest part
was lifting the mirror off,
00:33:09.740 --> 00:33:11.220
which is enormously heavy
00:33:11.500 --> 00:33:13.013
between each frame, to shoot the frame
00:33:13.180 --> 00:33:15.340
and then putting it back.
00:33:41.940 --> 00:33:44.460
The drawings themselves
with animation have to happen fast.
00:33:44.740 --> 00:33:47.913
-I just realized.
They\'re also actually quick.
00:33:48.080 --> 00:33:52.500
-They have to be fast otherwise you spend
if you\'ve got to make so many alterations.
00:33:52.980 --> 00:33:54.713
One of the things I\'ve discovered
with the animation, in fact,
00:33:54.880 --> 00:33:57.093
if it\'s done really roughly,
even if in the moment
00:33:57.260 --> 00:33:59.180
you can hardly see
what it is you\'ve drawn,
00:33:59.460 --> 00:34:03.700
once it is in movement and projected,
it constitutes itself.
00:34:04.220 --> 00:34:05.780
You can kind of see the figure.
00:34:39.680 --> 00:34:41.740
Sometimes you know there\'s no short way.
00:34:42.020 --> 00:34:43.893
The figure is over here
and somehow he\'s got to walk
00:34:44.060 --> 00:34:45.533
to the other end of the sheet of paper.
00:34:45.700 --> 00:34:47.940
You\'ve got to erase him and redraw him.
00:34:48.900 --> 00:34:52.460
There\'s not a kind of a pleasure
of discovery in each alteration.
00:34:53.700 --> 00:34:56.053
It feels like being kind of [?]
00:34:56.220 --> 00:35:00.013
You just got to be conscientious
and do it.
00:35:00.180 --> 00:35:03.773
On the scale of animators
and the kind of obsessiveness
00:35:03.940 --> 00:35:06.620
with which some work I\'m very slip shot.
00:35:07.020 --> 00:35:09.380
Some people spend years
on a three-minute film.
00:35:09.660 --> 00:35:10.973
For me, it would be unbearable.
00:35:11.140 --> 00:35:13.533
If there\'s a sequence
which is going too slowly
00:35:13.700 --> 00:35:17.133
then I\'ll kind of compensate myself
by having an easy sequence
00:35:17.300 --> 00:35:18.933
the next day which is many seconds longer
00:35:19.100 --> 00:35:21.460
with relatively few alterations.
00:35:29.740 --> 00:35:33.453
The moment in the film I made
in which a man kisses a woman\'s hand
00:35:33.620 --> 00:35:35.620
and he needs to leave,
like an erotic gift.
00:35:36.220 --> 00:35:38.253
I said, \"Okay, we could have this horse
that\'s galloping
00:35:38.420 --> 00:35:39.780
around and around.\"
00:35:40.500 --> 00:35:42.253
I said, \"My God.
To draw that horse is going
00:35:42.420 --> 00:35:44.973
to take an hour and then
to erase it and redraw it.
00:35:45.140 --> 00:35:47.580
I\'ll be here for a week,
to get it to do one half circle.\"
00:35:47.820 --> 00:35:49.460
Whereas everybody knows
how to draw a fish
00:35:49.700 --> 00:35:52.613
and then to film it and to rub it out
and draw the fish in a new position.
00:35:52.780 --> 00:35:56.420
In half an hour you could
have a fish starting to circle the hand.
00:35:56.700 --> 00:35:58.373
In the end, the fish was
a much happier image.
00:35:58.540 --> 00:36:02.413
Also slipping off the hand as a kind
of slippery kind of half sperm,
00:36:02.580 --> 00:36:05.380
half wet thing that bounced
on the hand and dropped off.
00:36:44.860 --> 00:36:47.133
Coming back just to do
a chocolate drawing is like a treat.
00:36:47.300 --> 00:36:52.860
That\'s kind of like time off in the studio
and other projects are under control.
00:36:53.180 --> 00:36:55.800
Then to come and either work
on a small scale
00:36:56.180 --> 00:37:00.860
or on a larger scale is kind
of my application to myself.
00:37:01.300 --> 00:37:02.540
That\'s meeting an old friend.
00:37:02.780 --> 00:37:04.580
It\'s going to be a comfortable
conversation.
00:38:52.300 --> 00:38:56.213
One of the things I\'ve learned
about drawing from animating is the speed.
00:38:56.380 --> 00:39:00.493
The speed, which is a necessity
in the animation
00:39:00.660 --> 00:39:02.613
becomes a kind of a virtue in the drawing.
00:39:02.780 --> 00:39:04.820
Not a virtue, but it helps the drawing.
00:39:06.280 --> 00:39:08.693
If one gets too precious
about knuckle movements
00:39:08.860 --> 00:39:10.300
that take too long
00:39:11.060 --> 00:39:15.420
then one gets anxious
about erasing it with the wipe of a cloth.
00:39:27.500 --> 00:39:29.213
In the end, of course,
this gets solidified
00:39:29.380 --> 00:39:35.513
into a fixed final image rather
than continuing to moved off
00:39:35.680 --> 00:39:38.020
the sheet of paper or become
something else
00:39:38.220 --> 00:39:40.060
so it gets a bit more precious.
00:39:44.420 --> 00:39:46.653
One of the troubles about drawing on
the table
00:39:46.820 --> 00:39:50.013
is that there\'s not
that much new viewing of the image.
00:39:50.180 --> 00:39:52.060
You\'re watching
the same image the whole time.
00:39:52.260 --> 00:39:53.893
Whereas when you\'re animating
or when you\'ve got the drawing
00:39:54.060 --> 00:39:54.893
on the wall.
00:39:55.060 --> 00:39:55.773
It\'s a movement away.
00:39:55.940 --> 00:40:00.100
Where you can\'t see what you\'ve done
and the moment when you turn around
00:40:00.340 --> 00:40:01.740
when you see it again afresh.
00:40:03.020 --> 00:40:24.060
[music]
00:40:24.340 --> 00:40:25.893
-It\'s a mixture
both of ideas about the world,
00:40:26.060 --> 00:40:28.540
but also finding something
that meets your ideas halfway.
00:40:28.780 --> 00:40:31.373
It\'s an image that calls to be drawn,
in this case,
00:40:31.540 --> 00:40:34.700
of cameras are beautiful things
to draw as objects.
00:40:34.940 --> 00:40:37.213
-Yes, it\'s a joke,
your camera looks sexier-
00:40:37.380 --> 00:40:39.453
-It does.
--than your male character sometimes.
00:40:39.620 --> 00:40:43.380
[laughter]
00:40:44.860 --> 00:40:45.853
-They\'ll forgive you.
00:40:46.020 --> 00:40:49.813
-There\'s a lot of passion that\'s gone
into drawing with camera many times.
00:40:49.980 --> 00:40:59.540
[music]
00:41:00.700 --> 00:41:05.900
-It is strange for people often
because I speak about intimacy indeed
00:41:06.380 --> 00:41:10.213
and love stories
and this and that that I almost
00:41:10.380 --> 00:41:11.860
always use a photograph.
00:41:12.860 --> 00:41:16.413
I was surprised actually to see
that I almost never used
00:41:16.580 --> 00:41:17.740
the camera myself.
00:41:18.460 --> 00:41:22.773
I once made a little film only once
and I tried to walk with
00:41:22.940 --> 00:41:29.053
an old Super 8 camera
and I realized how extremely irritating.
00:41:29.220 --> 00:41:35.020
I would go like this and everything I saw,
I couldn\'t see through the lens.
00:41:35.260 --> 00:41:38.573
I have a strange relationship
with the camera itself.
00:41:38.740 --> 00:41:40.173
When the picture\'s already taken,
00:41:40.340 --> 00:41:44.420
when it is already
two dimensional reality,
00:41:44.660 --> 00:41:46.333
then I feel very free woman.
00:41:46.500 --> 00:41:49.793
There was a whole book,
I think, that also that, what\'s his name?
00:41:49.960 --> 00:41:51.260
David Hockney wrote.
00:41:51.500 --> 00:41:54.013
He says the camera is like a cyclops
00:41:54.180 --> 00:41:57.580
because it\'s got one eye
and we\'ve got two eyes,
00:41:57.820 --> 00:42:01.980
and so I thought,
\"Ooh, never thought of that before.\"
00:42:02.220 --> 00:42:05.133
[music]
00:42:05.300 --> 00:42:08.453
The last portrait
I made of Elisabeth Eybers,
00:42:08.620 --> 00:42:09.620
for example,
00:42:09.900 --> 00:42:14.333
I realized that she is now 92 years old,
00:42:14.500 --> 00:42:19.700
so this is the last part of her life
and I wanted to bring a homage to her.
00:42:20.460 --> 00:42:23.833
What expressed this for me
was the eyes were dark
00:42:24.000 --> 00:42:26.413
and the face was very white.
00:42:26.580 --> 00:42:30.373
It was more about
this expression of this darkness
00:42:30.540 --> 00:42:34.513
in these eyes where you\'re scared
because your time is up,
00:42:34.680 --> 00:42:35.820
but you\'re also strong.
00:42:37.300 --> 00:42:41.860
In her case, the urge to do a portrait
of her was there already,
00:42:42.100 --> 00:42:44.300
and then I found the right photograph.
00:42:44.700 --> 00:42:47.893
-You didn\'t have to decide,
is it going to be two foot by two foot,
00:42:48.060 --> 00:42:50.020
is it going to be three meters
by three meters?
00:42:50.900 --> 00:42:53.453
Then is it a question
of holding the photo in one hand
00:42:53.620 --> 00:42:55.613
or is it on a table
and you walk back to the table
00:42:55.780 --> 00:42:56.933
and look at it, and then walked away?
00:42:57.100 --> 00:43:00.493
Or you look at it and \"I\'ve seen it,
I can now just go on with the painting\"?
00:43:00.660 --> 00:43:05.973
-I often project, I project the image,
but not to get the details,
00:43:06.140 --> 00:43:08.780
I project the image
to get the composition.
00:43:09.220 --> 00:43:14.340
I will zoom in on this bit and everything
that we don\'t need have to now fall off.
00:43:14.660 --> 00:43:17.013
-I did that.
-Yes, because while you\'re saying this,
00:43:17.180 --> 00:43:20.653
I just want to say, because now it makes
me think of very old times
00:43:20.820 --> 00:43:24.020
when people would use the grid,
I never did that.
00:43:24.380 --> 00:43:28.820
[music]
00:43:29.180 --> 00:43:32.820
-I\'d been looking at Giotto
and did some drawings based on Giotto,
00:43:33.060 --> 00:43:36.173
and then cut out all the heads
to rearrange the heads
00:43:36.340 --> 00:43:37.253
and that pile of heads
00:43:37.420 --> 00:43:40.013
based on the Giotto
became Casspirs Full of Love,
00:43:40.180 --> 00:43:41.460
a series of box full of heads.
00:43:43.540 --> 00:43:45.580
[music]
00:43:45.860 --> 00:43:48.013
The Giottos are extraordinary
in the sense of crowds,
00:43:48.180 --> 00:43:50.940
where they are so much like movies,
but also like news.
00:43:51.340 --> 00:43:53.780
You think of the Massacre
of the Innocents,
00:43:54.060 --> 00:43:57.020
which has, at the bottom,
this pile of dead children,
00:43:57.300 --> 00:44:00.213
which you don\'t really see again,
can you see it in newspaper photographs,
00:44:00.380 --> 00:44:02.460
can you see it in documentary footage?
00:44:03.060 --> 00:44:05.220
[music]
00:44:05.540 --> 00:44:08.740
I\'m interested in rescuing
the idea of politics from certainty.
00:44:09.780 --> 00:44:13.060
If you\'re still talking about the world
and about power relations and things,
00:44:13.300 --> 00:44:15.073
within that discussion,
there needs to be a space
00:44:15.240 --> 00:44:18.053
for getting it wrong for people
not known for uncertainty
00:44:18.220 --> 00:44:21.260
and doubt and confusion
and contradiction.
00:44:22.900 --> 00:44:26.133
I\'m interested in trying to show
that lack of clarity
00:44:26.300 --> 00:44:29.340
in the terrain that is normally described
as the political.
00:44:29.660 --> 00:44:34.133
For one thing you\'ve learned
is not to trust men from the 18th century,
00:44:34.300 --> 00:44:36.460
men who assume they know
what\'s best for everyone else.
00:44:36.980 --> 00:44:39.933
As we know,
if there\'s one danger in the world,
00:44:40.100 --> 00:44:43.420
it\'s people assuming they know
what\'s best for everyone else.
00:44:44.340 --> 00:44:46.373
Sometimes I feel these
are all the extraordinary things
00:44:46.540 --> 00:44:48.620
that are happening in this country
at the moment
00:44:49.020 --> 00:44:50.733
and none of those are
in my work at the moment.
00:44:50.900 --> 00:44:52.853
I\'m thinking about something
completely different.
00:44:53.020 --> 00:44:56.733
There is a twin saying,
\"How do these things get in?
00:44:56.900 --> 00:44:57.653
Will they get in?
00:44:57.820 --> 00:44:58.773
Are they part of the work?\"
00:44:58.940 --> 00:45:01.413
I\'m not sure until I can find
a way that they feel writing it,
00:45:01.580 --> 00:45:03.613
it doesn\'t make sense.
-Yes, but I also don\'t think
00:45:03.780 --> 00:45:05.233
the artists have to.
00:45:05.400 --> 00:45:07.653
You can do certain things as a person.
00:45:07.820 --> 00:45:10.973
Sometimes you shoot out of respect,
leave certain things alone
00:45:11.140 --> 00:45:13.540
because they can do it
better than you can.
00:45:13.780 --> 00:45:15.973
[music]
00:45:16.140 --> 00:45:18.773
-I was drawing series of images
of people who had been killed,
00:45:18.940 --> 00:45:19.453
of dead bodies.
00:45:19.620 --> 00:45:22.293
Somebody got this whole pile
of photographs of murdered people
00:45:22.460 --> 00:45:23.260
from the police.
00:45:23.500 --> 00:45:26.053
There\'s something horrific
about that box of photographs,
00:45:26.220 --> 00:45:27.901
not something a lot that\'s horrific in it.
00:45:29.740 --> 00:45:31.273
On the one hand, said,
\"Oh, this is just cheap.\"
00:45:31.440 --> 00:45:33.533
You take other people\'s pain
or the other traumas
00:45:33.700 --> 00:45:35.893
and you turn it into art,
and that\'s a different question,
00:45:36.060 --> 00:45:37.820
so a real question,
but it\'s a different one.
00:45:38.900 --> 00:45:43.013
The hope was that somewhere
in the process of making the drawing
00:45:43.180 --> 00:45:44.453
and in someone looking at the drawing,
00:45:44.620 --> 00:45:47.973
is it awareness of the respect
that those hours of studying
00:45:48.140 --> 00:45:50.413
that image and turning it
from a photograph
00:45:50.580 --> 00:45:52.373
into the drawing entails?
00:45:52.540 --> 00:45:55.013
I wouldn\'t say that a drawing
of that body is more profound
00:45:55.180 --> 00:45:56.540
than the photograph of the body,
00:45:56.740 --> 00:45:58.293
but I think it can work
in a different way.
00:45:58.460 --> 00:47:17.060
[music]
00:47:17.340 --> 00:47:21.093
-Somehow it comes over sometimes
in a different way
00:47:21.260 --> 00:47:23.893
because you get a different expression
00:47:24.060 --> 00:47:26.733
while a photograph in the newspaper,
for example,
00:47:26.900 --> 00:47:30.853
is always an action has happened,
always someone is crying or so.
00:47:31.020 --> 00:47:35.140
They\'re not posing for 10 hours.
00:47:35.500 --> 00:47:39.893
I actually don\'t
like the enormous long posing thing.
00:47:40.060 --> 00:47:43.140
I also don\'t want this naked person
there with me.
00:47:43.420 --> 00:47:45.340
-For 23 hours, no.
-Yes.
00:47:45.740 --> 00:47:48.373
-In the animation, because it\'s so slow,
you can\'t really have a model.
00:47:48.540 --> 00:47:50.653
I need you to stand here
for two weeks slowly
00:47:50.820 --> 00:47:52.413
turning from this side to that side.
00:47:52.580 --> 00:47:53.900
[music]
00:47:56.180 --> 00:47:57.861
There are things
one can say about oneself,
00:47:58.620 --> 00:48:00.173
which suddenly
if you\'re saying about other people,
00:48:00.340 --> 00:48:02.093
you\'ve got to take all sorts
of responsibilities.
00:48:02.260 --> 00:48:04.733
For example, [?] act
in the character in the film,
00:48:04.900 --> 00:48:06.493
there was accusation that\'s antisemitic.
00:48:06.660 --> 00:48:09.293
Why have you drawn
this nasty person as Jewish?
00:48:09.460 --> 00:48:11.453
In a sense, it\'s just saying,
okay, I\'m going to take responsibility
00:48:11.620 --> 00:48:13.940
for that character as myself.
00:48:14.860 --> 00:48:19.893
[music]
00:48:20.060 --> 00:48:23.153
In the series Ubu Enchaîné,
Ubu already come the way
00:48:23.320 --> 00:48:25.393
that he looks from Jarry
with a spiral belly and
00:48:25.560 --> 00:48:26.493
a pointed head,
00:48:26.660 --> 00:48:29.173
a very simple childish
drawing that Jarry did.
00:48:29.340 --> 00:48:32.273
I wanted to do something which both
had that as one layer
00:48:32.440 --> 00:48:35.700
like a chalk drawing
on a black ground of Jarry\'s Ubu
00:48:36.060 --> 00:48:39.020
and inside is a much
more fleshy human figure.
00:48:40.100 --> 00:48:42.293
For those edges as well,
I\'ll just take photographs
00:48:42.460 --> 00:48:44.693
of myself to use those for the reference
00:48:44.860 --> 00:48:47.733
as acting the part of Ubu
so it could be as ridiculous;
00:48:47.900 --> 00:48:50.613
naked on a bicycle,
riding around the studio,
00:48:50.780 --> 00:48:54.413
doing a crazy dance,
and naked in front of a mirror.
00:48:54.580 --> 00:48:56.960
Things that if I said I\'m going
to do a drawing of myself,
00:48:57.340 --> 00:49:00.293
I would never have dared to do
because they were so ridiculous.
00:49:00.460 --> 00:49:04.540
I think sometimes one has that sense
of drawing oneself in the third person.
00:49:04.780 --> 00:49:08.133
To say to someone,
\"Okay, what I need you to do
00:49:08.300 --> 00:49:11.533
is to take off her clothes
and here\'s my son\'s tiny bicycle,\"
00:49:11.700 --> 00:49:13.373
so your knees are going
to be up around your ears
00:49:13.540 --> 00:49:15.333
and to ride around the studio
so I can film,
00:49:15.500 --> 00:49:16.900
which I may or may not use.
00:49:17.340 --> 00:49:21.413
Sometimes I use myself,
sometimes I\'ve used Anne, my wife,
00:49:21.580 --> 00:49:27.613
who\'s been very generous about doing
these kinds of activities as parents.
00:49:27.780 --> 00:49:29.580
Whereas I think some artists it\'s fine.
00:49:30.060 --> 00:49:33.260
They call in a model and these are
the ridiculous things I need you to do.
00:49:33.940 --> 00:49:37.173
-I have used naked bodies,
again, for different reasons also.
00:49:37.340 --> 00:49:41.053
The Snow White one
also I used myself in it,
00:49:41.220 --> 00:49:45.300
but it was not an inviting painting.
00:49:45.660 --> 00:49:49.613
Then Magdalena\'s was more
about confronting, you say,
00:49:49.780 --> 00:49:50.940
\"Okay, here I am.\"
00:49:51.260 --> 00:49:57.893
[music]
00:49:58.060 --> 00:50:01.260
-I hadn\'t thought, do I draw myself mainly
or do I draw other people?
00:50:01.980 --> 00:50:04.273
If I now do a catalog in my head,
I\'m trying to catalog
00:50:04.440 --> 00:50:05.760
and go through all the different.
00:50:10.220 --> 00:50:11.693
Make note, draw other people.
00:50:11.860 --> 00:50:14.860
[laughter]
00:50:15.260 --> 00:50:16.693
Also, draw more heads.
00:50:16.860 --> 00:50:18.333
Certainly that one.
-Yes, okay.
00:50:18.500 --> 00:50:20.880
-I love drawing heads.
I\'ve done it for a long time.
00:50:21.700 --> 00:50:26.353
-My people is still immobile,
they don\'t move enough.
00:50:26.520 --> 00:50:29.613
They mostly just confront you
or they fall down dead
00:50:29.780 --> 00:50:32.420
or they show their backside,
00:50:32.780 --> 00:50:34.860
but they\'re not moving enough.
00:50:36.300 --> 00:50:46.980
[music]
00:50:47.820 --> 00:50:51.173
-I\'ve recently been looking
at some 18th-century pornography
00:50:51.340 --> 00:50:53.173
to look at what were drawings done.
00:50:53.340 --> 00:50:55.973
Really, ones familiar
with photographic pornography
00:50:56.140 --> 00:50:58.360
and how bodies join together
in the extraordinary
00:50:59.660 --> 00:51:02.773
where in which bodies shift
from being objects of desire
00:51:02.940 --> 00:51:05.093
to suddenly be pieces
of like open-heart surgery
00:51:05.260 --> 00:51:07.900
when desire becomes meat.
00:51:08.580 --> 00:51:11.693
Using some of those as models
for some drawings
00:51:11.860 --> 00:51:14.660
and some books that I\'ve been making,
00:51:14.900 --> 00:51:16.893
but there is a restraint
and I feel it needs
00:51:17.060 --> 00:51:18.180
the courage that you have.
00:51:18.460 --> 00:51:25.053
-If one wanted to make without critique,
00:51:25.220 --> 00:51:28.253
without this, but really wanted
to paint something
00:51:28.420 --> 00:51:31.693
that was for life
and pleasurable and saying,
00:51:31.860 --> 00:51:36.093
okay, sexuality is okay,
how would you do it then?
00:51:36.260 --> 00:51:37.540
What form would it take?
00:51:39.580 --> 00:51:55.700
[music]
00:51:55.940 --> 00:51:58.033
How does it feel, the whole tone of it?
00:51:58.200 --> 00:52:03.413
Not just drawing a sexual act or so,
and then also,
00:52:03.580 --> 00:52:06.300
what is the difference between,
say, if I\'m in love with you
00:52:06.940 --> 00:52:11.613
and I want to show that and the difference
between if I wasn\'t in love with you
00:52:11.780 --> 00:52:12.840
and also draw you.
00:52:13.340 --> 00:52:14.860
These type of things.
00:52:15.500 --> 00:52:20.360
Sometimes I feel I have used
pornographic poses
00:52:20.580 --> 00:52:24.573
to say something maybe
about a pleasurable experience
00:52:24.740 --> 00:52:26.820
and not so much about the porno.
00:52:27.140 --> 00:52:29.860
[music]
00:52:30.420 --> 00:52:32.893
-It\'s not so much an anxiety
about what would other people say,
00:52:33.060 --> 00:52:34.233
it\'s an anxiety about myself.
00:52:34.400 --> 00:52:36.933
If I was to be doing
these pornographic drawings,
00:52:37.100 --> 00:52:41.660
would it in fact be exactly the same;
enjoying the eroticism
00:52:41.940 --> 00:52:45.013
and the desire exactly
as they are in the photograph?
00:52:45.180 --> 00:52:46.980
Which also go
through such a transformation.
00:52:47.660 --> 00:52:51.253
You can see they\'re
based on pornographic photos,
00:52:51.420 --> 00:52:52.453
but they\'re not trying to do
the same thing
00:52:52.620 --> 00:52:53.973
that the pornographic photos do.
00:52:54.140 --> 00:52:56.253
-Yes, for example,
I saw a beautiful exhibition
00:52:56.420 --> 00:52:59.533
and a very early Chinese pornography,
00:52:59.700 --> 00:53:03.213
if you would call it that,
but what was so beautiful about them
00:53:03.380 --> 00:53:06.293
is these people,
they are doing these things,
00:53:06.460 --> 00:53:11.980
but they\'re drinking tea and the leaves
are done with the same delicacy.
00:53:12.260 --> 00:53:20.140
[music]
00:53:20.620 --> 00:53:25.133
It\'s also so interesting the difference
between those Chinese works,
00:53:25.300 --> 00:53:28.653
and then the Japanese works
because with the Japanese works,
00:53:28.820 --> 00:53:32.660
for example, of a specific period
that always have enormous.
00:53:32.900 --> 00:53:36.293
They are also very elegant,
but the men are always enormous
00:53:36.460 --> 00:53:39.133
and I\'m sure it\'s not
because the Japanese
00:53:39.300 --> 00:53:41.993
is so much more enormous
than the Chinese, but it\'s,
00:53:42.160 --> 00:53:47.760
again, also a different attitude to life.
00:53:53.740 --> 00:53:58.493
Can just say porn now or nude or deaf
00:53:58.660 --> 00:54:03.060
as if it\'s all the same
because every artist
00:54:04.700 --> 00:54:08.053
has the way they treat the whole thing.
00:54:08.220 --> 00:54:12.713
Okay, they\'re doing
sexually explicit acts,
00:54:12.880 --> 00:54:15.653
but they\'re doing it with,
as I say, with the detail
00:54:15.820 --> 00:54:20.853
of the leaves and the clothes
and little shoes is all equal
00:54:21.020 --> 00:54:23.333
to the sexual act almost.
00:54:23.500 --> 00:54:28.740
That gives a whole different
feel than, for example,
00:54:32.500 --> 00:54:38.253
this Oshitoshi guy,
but he\'s also fantastic.
00:54:38.420 --> 00:54:43.273
Here is much more always
something violent is happening.
00:54:43.440 --> 00:54:46.940
There\'s a little bird also going,
but he\'s cutting her throat
00:54:48.780 --> 00:54:50.373
like this type of seeds.
00:54:50.540 --> 00:54:53.453
My goodness,
I use this in one of my lectures.
00:54:53.620 --> 00:55:00.153
I never have any bun
at least in the bigger paintings.
00:55:00.320 --> 00:55:04.100
There\'s no one ever doing something
to somebody else.
00:55:04.300 --> 00:55:06.493
The suggestions
is that some people make up
00:55:06.660 --> 00:55:09.413
all their stories also
with many of the sexual things.
00:55:09.580 --> 00:55:15.493
Mostly you cannot see if the person
is what they are doing
00:55:15.660 --> 00:55:16.533
all this type of story.
00:55:16.700 --> 00:55:21.293
His is indeed, he\'s blowing
his own head off or something.
00:55:21.460 --> 00:55:25.820
I always say if you say to me
I make a horrific thing,
00:55:26.540 --> 00:55:29.060
in comparison to what are you saying?
00:55:29.260 --> 00:55:32.133
What is your context that you pledge?
00:55:32.300 --> 00:55:33.940
That\'s all what I mean.
00:55:34.260 --> 00:55:37.413
As I say, it\'s not that you have
to know all these things
00:55:37.580 --> 00:55:39.873
to say I\'m moved by my painting.
00:55:40.040 --> 00:55:42.813
I always have to know
because it\'s beautiful.
00:55:42.980 --> 00:55:44.653
Sometimes someone
who doesn\'t know anything
00:55:44.820 --> 00:55:50.380
can also say something extremely
meaningful or beautiful.
00:55:50.740 --> 00:55:52.693
Then you look at these things
with her hair
00:55:52.860 --> 00:55:57.100
and skirt fold in almost everything,
00:55:57.340 --> 00:55:59.813
and then comes all the other stories,
and then,
00:55:59.980 --> 00:56:03.133
oh, I get all jealous
and excited and I think,
00:56:03.300 --> 00:56:08.340
\"Oh, maybe I can still do
a painting with a dress on.\"
00:56:08.700 --> 00:56:10.853
I don\'t know what to do
with the dress still.
00:56:11.020 --> 00:56:14.533
Anyway, you see, so that aspect.
00:56:14.700 --> 00:56:17.493
That\'s when I\'m sorry when people
just think it\'s somber
00:56:17.660 --> 00:56:25.020
and it\'s this because it is also filled
with a lust for life a bit.
00:56:25.940 --> 00:56:29.493
-In one of the first from Johannesburg\'s
section, Greater City,
00:56:29.660 --> 00:56:31.533
which was made in 1989,
the films had to go
00:56:31.700 --> 00:56:36.620
before the Publications Control Board
in South Africa.
00:56:37.220 --> 00:56:39.700
I remember the report came back saying,
00:56:40.060 --> 00:56:43.780
\"The film contains scenes
of copulation and fellatio,
00:56:44.020 --> 00:56:45.833
however,
they are sufficiently badly drawn,
00:56:46.000 --> 00:56:47.053
so it\'s not to cause offense.\"
00:56:47.220 --> 00:56:49.693
[laughter]
00:56:49.860 --> 00:57:21.380
[music]
00:57:32.540 --> 00:57:36.253
There are certain films
in which the technique of animation
00:57:36.420 --> 00:57:37.420
is erasure,
00:57:37.740 --> 00:57:40.653
so you have an image
and you use an eraser
00:57:40.820 --> 00:57:45.900
to remove the charcoal
to make the drawing.
00:57:47.020 --> 00:57:50.053
The other work that comes
from the theater work from Voetsek,
00:57:50.220 --> 00:57:53.133
which was the first production
in which we had paper cut out
00:57:53.300 --> 00:57:54.300
shadow figures,
00:57:55.380 --> 00:58:00.173
was arriving
at figures through tearing sheets of paper
00:58:00.340 --> 00:58:02.613
and finding what you recognized
when they were put together,
00:58:02.780 --> 00:58:04.660
the piece of paper put together.
00:58:04.900 --> 00:58:08.840
For me, that\'s a different kind
of destruction of the image
00:58:09.260 --> 00:58:11.700
or destruction of what you expect
an image to look like.
00:58:14.020 --> 00:58:25.180
A slow deformation of this nose
into a different shape is not so obvious.
00:58:28.380 --> 00:58:30.573
If you have your nose,
it\'s easy enough to animate
00:58:30.740 --> 00:58:34.180
it fragment by fragment,
shifting it, moving the nose.
00:58:37.540 --> 00:58:38.700
Moving it along.
00:58:43.660 --> 00:58:46.980
To transform it into something
else, you must probably first have to,
00:58:55.580 --> 00:59:01.060
in a sense, have to explore the fragments
as the pieces start shifting,
00:59:03.380 --> 00:59:08.940
and it can transform
and become goodness knows what.
00:59:09.860 --> 00:59:12.213
That\'s also why the tearing
is an important part
00:59:12.380 --> 00:59:13.533
because that\'s the model.
00:59:13.700 --> 00:59:18.900
That\'s the way
in which transformation is possible.
00:59:19.260 --> 00:59:32.900
[background noise]
00:59:33.180 --> 01:00:26.140
[music]
01:00:26.380 --> 01:00:28.533
At some stage, with almost all the films,
01:00:28.700 --> 01:00:29.900
there\'s a process of,
01:00:30.500 --> 01:00:34.013
I wouldn\'t call it researchers
to higher term,
01:00:34.180 --> 01:00:38.833
but there\'s a gathering
of information of visual images,
01:00:39.000 --> 01:00:41.380
of photographs of other drawing.
01:00:42.320 --> 01:00:44.673
Sometimes it was photographing
people in the poses
01:00:44.840 --> 01:00:47.620
that are now or the actions
I know I\'m going to need in the films,
01:00:49.580 --> 01:00:51.700
but usually,
that comes once the film has begun.
01:00:52.500 --> 01:00:55.220
If you know it\'s a beginning,
even roughly the whole arc
01:00:55.820 --> 01:00:59.580
or then I get blind to a lot
of other things that could emerge.
01:01:00.780 --> 01:01:03.093
There is a confidence that\'s come
from doing this
01:01:03.260 --> 01:01:05.433
from all these years
and the confidence is knowing
01:01:05.600 --> 01:01:07.593
that in any of the films
where there\'s been something
01:01:07.760 --> 01:01:10.220
that\'s either surprised me
or interested me,
01:01:11.420 --> 01:01:13.940
it\'s not been something I\'ve known
at the beginning of the film.
01:01:14.980 --> 01:01:18.013
It doesn\'t make me more confident
to do more and more work
01:01:18.180 --> 01:01:20.580
before the film starts,
it makes me more anxious
01:01:21.180 --> 01:01:22.893
in the sense
that I feel that every good idea
01:01:23.060 --> 01:01:24.700
I have before the film starts
01:01:25.100 --> 01:01:27.253
is going to get a band,
but it has to do with,
01:01:27.420 --> 01:01:33.420
again, finding ways to surprise or out
to get passed one\'s own predictability
01:01:33.620 --> 01:01:34.780
and one\'s own stupidity.
01:01:35.540 --> 01:01:40.420
[music]
01:01:54.820 --> 01:01:58.500
Usually, it\'s a pleasure to have things
out of the studio and gone.
01:01:58.980 --> 01:02:01.173
I don\'t have a precious attitude
to wanting to hang
01:02:01.340 --> 01:02:03.253
onto everything around me.
01:02:03.420 --> 01:02:05.773
-There we agree, absolutely.
01:02:05.940 --> 01:02:08.580
I also, I\'d rather let them go.
01:02:09.140 --> 01:02:11.580
Very pleased that they can go.
01:02:12.100 --> 01:02:15.613
There is a pleasure in the fact
that the work goes
01:02:15.780 --> 01:02:21.140
to a place or someone
that really actually wants it,
01:02:22.140 --> 01:02:24.273
but sometimes everyone
should look at them
01:02:24.440 --> 01:02:27.893
longer because
there is indeed it\'s different
01:02:28.060 --> 01:02:30.573
from the private space
to the public space
01:02:30.740 --> 01:02:33.013
because then suddenly,
there is more distance
01:02:33.180 --> 01:02:37.260
and you also see them in a different way
01:02:37.500 --> 01:02:42.013
and that there\'s definitely
a cooling off of atmosphere
01:02:42.180 --> 01:02:44.413
because when you around all your things
01:02:44.580 --> 01:02:46.860
and all your thoughts and the,
01:02:47.180 --> 01:02:52.640
the public space
is a colder space in a sense.
01:02:53.220 --> 01:02:57.413
-I quite often find on an exhibition works
that I thought were
01:02:57.580 --> 01:02:59.101
the ones I already liked in the studio
01:02:59.300 --> 01:03:01.253
are not the ones
that I really still liked at the end
01:03:01.420 --> 01:03:01.893
of the exhibition.
01:03:02.060 --> 01:03:04.933
Those which I was quite uncertain
about even putting on exhibition
01:03:05.100 --> 01:03:06.581
are the ones that seem much stronger.
01:03:06.980 --> 01:03:14.100
[background noise]
01:03:14.380 --> 01:03:19.993
It\'s not as if having lots
of exhibition stops you still being awake
01:03:20.160 --> 01:03:22.580
at 4:00 in the morning
in a panic of anxiety,
01:03:23.060 --> 01:03:25.613
the specifics of the anxiety to change.
01:03:25.780 --> 01:03:27.333
That\'s maybe not about,
\"Oh my God, is anyone ever going
01:03:27.500 --> 01:03:29.300
to buy a picture of mine,\"
01:03:30.100 --> 01:03:32.913
but it\'s still the same anxiety
is what I\'m doing actually going
01:03:33.080 --> 01:03:34.333
where it should be, is it any good?
01:03:34.500 --> 01:03:36.060
Does it make any sense?
01:03:36.260 --> 01:03:38.533
If only I hadn\'t taken on this project,
then I would be happy,
01:03:38.700 --> 01:03:40.933
but no, this one is
definitely going to be.
01:03:41.100 --> 01:03:44.653
That I think is built into the activity,
for me, certainly of being an artist.
01:03:44.820 --> 01:03:46.053
I\'d hope it will disappear,
01:03:46.220 --> 01:03:47.580
but it doesn\'t,
01:03:48.060 --> 01:03:49.813
but there\'s also no doubt
that there are so many more
01:03:49.980 --> 01:03:52.420
kinds of projects that I would like
to do are now possible,
01:03:53.220 --> 01:03:56.700
such as working in opera, working
on different scale.
01:03:57.040 --> 01:04:00.493
That brings with it its own set
of anxieties in other words.
01:04:00.660 --> 01:04:02.853
It\'s not a question
of I can do this project.
01:04:03.020 --> 01:04:05.380
That\'s different from,
should these projects be done at all?
01:04:07.500 --> 01:04:09.800
It certainly also means
that if you do something,
01:04:10.420 --> 01:04:12.213
the first impulse
of people is to look at it,
01:04:12.380 --> 01:04:13.413
to give it the time of day,
01:04:13.580 --> 01:04:16.033
rather than to dismiss it
before they\'ve actually looked at it,
01:04:16.200 --> 01:04:18.133
which is if you\'re
a young artist or starting out,
01:04:18.300 --> 01:04:19.660
that\'s generally the condition.
01:04:20.100 --> 01:04:22.773
It feels a fortunate position to be in.
01:04:22.940 --> 01:04:23.940
There\'s no doubt.
01:04:24.180 --> 01:04:27.813
-What is unfortunate is recently,
01:04:27.980 --> 01:04:31.533
because of certain auction things
that happened,
01:04:31.700 --> 01:04:35.413
so you don\'t know anymore
if someone quickly throws something
01:04:35.580 --> 01:04:38.773
on an auction if they really actually ever
liked it in the first place.
01:04:38.940 --> 01:04:41.660
I never said all these things is worth.
01:04:42.100 --> 01:04:45.780
Just because I make them, they are worth.
01:04:46.660 --> 01:04:50.453
I can be my own critic,
01:04:50.620 --> 01:04:54.133
so sometimes all kinds of things
gets on auctions.
01:04:54.300 --> 01:04:56.933
That\'s not so good
and I agree they\'re not so good,
01:04:57.100 --> 01:04:58.660
but I didn\'t put them on there.
01:04:59.420 --> 01:05:09.740
[music]
01:05:10.100 --> 01:05:13.133
When is always so terrible
I find when I have to start
01:05:13.300 --> 01:05:16.680
and I have in my head
all these things how I\'m now going
01:05:18.220 --> 01:05:20.733
to make something totally different,
and then you start
01:05:20.900 --> 01:05:27.460
and it just goes totally wrong
in its extreme mannerism and teaching.
01:05:29.460 --> 01:05:34.613
Then you do feel it works,
then it looks so easy that people say,
01:05:34.780 --> 01:05:39.020
\"Yes, she\'s lazy
because she doesn\'t do anything.\"
01:05:39.220 --> 01:05:41.493
I was very pleased to read.
01:05:41.660 --> 01:05:47.740
I never knew that once Matisse,
apart from that he\'s years ago dead,
01:05:48.140 --> 01:05:53.140
but also in a certain period of his life,
he actually showed his process.
01:05:53.380 --> 01:05:58.100
He exhibited his process
of how he got to a certain simplicity
01:05:58.780 --> 01:06:03.893
with photograph next to the work
because he wanted to show them
01:06:04.060 --> 01:06:07.173
that he didn\'t actually just go like this.
01:06:07.340 --> 01:06:13.700
I never thought man like him
would think that he needed to do that.
01:06:13.940 --> 01:06:23.140
Mostly some is new,
but many things are just rejects.
01:06:37.820 --> 01:06:41.533
This was once upon a time
Sophia Loren crying.
01:06:41.700 --> 01:06:46.440
[laughs]
01:06:47.140 --> 01:06:52.540
In this painting at a certain stage,
I kept on going because of this.
01:06:52.780 --> 01:06:57.013
It wasn\'t, obviously,
not at all Sophia Loren anymore.
01:06:57.180 --> 01:07:00.900
There was that related it all to that,
that was clear.
01:07:01.180 --> 01:07:03.260
Then I go on with the painting
01:07:03.520 --> 01:07:06.093
and I think,
\"Okay, let\'s see where it takes me.\"
01:07:06.260 --> 01:07:11.993
It goes this way, it goes that way,
and it\'s hard to want to give it up
01:07:12.160 --> 01:07:16.773
because you feel,
\"Aargh, I still would love
01:07:16.940 --> 01:07:21.580
to keep all the things I taught
you in high school.\"
01:07:22.020 --> 01:07:29.613
Is if the painting now gets
so thick that it\'s so overworked,
01:07:29.780 --> 01:07:32.620
then you can\'t get the freshness back.
01:07:32.860 --> 01:07:41.940
Here, it\'s gone this way, that way,
that way, so somehow that urgency is gone.
01:07:42.700 --> 01:07:46.820
Then it does happen in three months,
you are so pleased.
01:07:47.060 --> 01:07:49.220
It\'s like the grace
of things coming together
01:07:49.540 --> 01:07:51.820
and this is sometimes the very irritating
01:07:52.100 --> 01:07:55.853
at a certain point where you
have all these things,
01:07:56.020 --> 01:07:57.220
so you have all these.
01:07:57.460 --> 01:08:00.253
That\'s why I should immediately turn
them all around
01:08:00.420 --> 01:08:02.013
because you have
all these things around you
01:08:02.180 --> 01:08:05.860
that actually is all just very irritating.
01:08:08.820 --> 01:08:12.053
That\'s also why you don\'t even have
the show and the show looks
01:08:12.220 --> 01:08:13.700
all clean and proper,
01:08:13.980 --> 01:08:18.573
so then you get the criticism that,
yes, there\'s no struggle
01:08:18.740 --> 01:08:22.980
or nothing and you left
with all the rubbish.
01:08:24.380 --> 01:08:28.380
[music]
01:08:28.780 --> 01:08:30.773
-I was thinking what you said
the other day that one should change.
01:08:30.940 --> 01:08:35.413
Staying the same is easy,
changing is hard.
01:08:35.580 --> 01:08:36.580
Change to what?
01:08:39.060 --> 01:08:41.120
I said, should I get a private tailor?
01:08:41.340 --> 01:08:42.660
Should I start smoking cigars?
01:08:43.060 --> 01:08:45.460
Those are the things that I should change,
to get a toupee,
01:08:45.660 --> 01:08:46.900
should I become a surf bum?
01:08:47.620 --> 01:08:48.933
No. [chuckles]
-No, I don\'t want that.
01:08:49.100 --> 01:08:51.573
I want to be more disciplined,
for example.
01:08:51.740 --> 01:08:52.740
-Oh, okay.
01:08:52.940 --> 01:08:57.973
-Prepare myself before I come
to situations like this and say,
01:08:58.140 --> 01:09:00.493
\"No, thank you.
I don\'t speak in the morning\"
01:09:00.660 --> 01:09:02.493
because you are a morning person.
01:09:02.660 --> 01:09:04.253
You say, \"I\'m at a disadvantage.\"
01:09:04.420 --> 01:09:07.733
He looks much more intelligent than I
am because he\'s good to the morning,
01:09:07.900 --> 01:09:10.493
I\'m good at night,
but no one wants to speak to me
01:09:10.660 --> 01:09:13.620
and I want more power in the real sense.
01:09:14.420 --> 01:09:19.373
[music]
01:09:19.540 --> 01:09:23.333
The animal painting
if you\'re saying you\'re a big shot.
01:09:23.500 --> 01:09:36.733
[background conversation]
01:09:36.900 --> 01:09:39.573
-Here\'s an ordinary statement
about something just more recent,
01:09:39.740 --> 01:09:42.260
and then at the last minute,
it turns on its head.
01:09:42.700 --> 01:09:44.300
There\'s a bite in its head.
01:09:45.140 --> 01:09:47.653
Art and children,
keep art out of the reach of children act.
01:09:47.820 --> 01:09:48.940
Art and medicines.
01:09:49.460 --> 01:09:50.773
-It\'s not so heavy.
01:09:50.940 --> 01:09:56.960
You have to look at the language also,
relate, but anyway.
01:10:01.680 --> 01:10:03.933
I really wanted to go for my second open.
01:10:04.100 --> 01:10:05.853
-Please.
No, you must.
01:10:06.020 --> 01:10:08.140
-Please.
-Come.
01:10:08.860 --> 01:11:26.580
[music]
01:11:27.060 --> 01:11:39.740
[silence]
Distributor: Icarus Films
Length: 72 minutes
Date: 2009
Genre: Expository
Language: English
Color/BW:
Closed Captioning: Available
Existing customers, please log in to view this film.
New to Docuseek? Register to request a quote.
Related Films
Ursula von Rydingsvard: Into Her Own
An artistic biography of one of the few women in the world working in…
Donna Haraway: Story Telling for Earthly Survival
A portrait of one of the most important living thinkers in the fields…